If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual gay sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything. All of those things are antithetical to a healthy, stable, traditional family and that's sort of where we are in today's world, unfortunately. It all comes from, I would argue, the right to privacy that doesn't exist, in my opinion, in the United States Constitution.
- Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA)
::   Blog  ::   Photos  ::   Europe  ::   Books  ::   Articles  ::   Links  ::   Friends  ::   Combo Feed  ::   Mobile  ::    
Submit a story!
Need Help?

Powered by FeedBlitz

Most Popular
Download This American Life Episodes
An Experiment in Porn
Fuck For Forest
Leash gal sex pics
Japan and Atomic Bomb Effects

Random Entries:
Sarin Gas in Iraq
Hold your nose
Write your own Dubya speech!
Gay jokes abound
FBI: Possible Hate Crime Charge for von Brunn, Had No Open File

World Food/Slow Food
Globalization of Food and Agriculture
NAIS? Ridiculous.
The Effects of Globalization on Developing World Agricultural Systems
Jalapenos and Salmonella - Same Old Story?
Industrial Agriculture and Vertical Integration
London Restaurants

Recent Comments:
Greek Orthodox Church In Trouble?
North Carolina Smoking Ban - 1 Day In
Blogathon Post 1 - Globalization and Agriculture
Bush Calls For ANWR Drilling Again
Joe The Unbeliever - My Response to Crucial's Video About Me
george-at-dirtygreek.org george-at-dirtygreek.org



Twitter / DirtyGreek
Follow DirtyGreek on Twitter

My Flickr Photos
Syndicate Me!
Dirty Greek - Addicted To Oil
  Alternative / Renewable Energy : Addicted To Oil
You are NOT on the DirtyGreek.Org homepage. Please CLICK HERE to go there.

Might as well face it: As Dickerson says,
In his big speech, he attempted to do just that when he delivered the evening's most memorable line, "America is addicted to oil."

This was a switch from May of 2001 when Ari Fleischer, the president's spokesman, said that the right to consume massive energy resources was "an American way of life." I wasn't expecting any great departure after hearing Bush advisers and allies talk all day about "security" and "optimism" and about how the president was going to "change the tone" (again). But Bush did change the subject, at least a bit. Tomorrow we're all going to be talking about the "cellulosic ethanol" from corn stalks and "switch grass."

Even if some of the president's proposals sounded like futuristic gobbledygook, we now seem poised for a national debate about American energy dependence. That's more than we've come to expect from these dreary annual clapfests. Democrats might actually engage on this topic, instead of responding in the purely political way they did to last year's Social Security proposal. For a president who came from the oil business and who still has many friends and backers in the industry, putting this initiative at the top of his agenda took some guts.
I agree, but I just hope something comes of this. Six years until cars burning ethanol are competitive with gasoline ones? 75% reduction in oil dependence by 2025? The former sounds ok, but the latter sounds like not enough. We should be totally off of oil by 2025, and we may end up having to be, whether we want to be or not, if it ends up running out.
Posted By George on 02/01/2006 @ 11:11 AM | Link and Discuss (0) | More Alternative/RenewableEnergy oil energy ethanol bush stateoftheunion
Share And Enjoy: Post To Del.icio.us Post To Socialposter.com Post To Digg Post To Reddit Post To Technorati Post To Blinklist Post To Stumbleupon Post To Twitter Post To Google Bookmarks Post To NewsVine Post To Microsoft Live Email To A Friend

My Related Posts: Pop The Cap! Update - Write Your Senators! // Dean's trying to trick us! // Bolton To U.N. // Dover AFB photos // The End of Oil... //
No Comments
Name
Email
Subject
  Security Image
 
Comment