I toy around with the whole Biblical thing, just as amazing characters. What I've read, in terms of the Bible and shit, is that Satan's this super-charming guy who'll come off sweet as sugar, and that if you run into him, he'll try and fool you into thinking he's God. From all of that, wouldn't that probably make God the devil, if he's such a good liar? I can't think of any really horrendous shit that's been caused by the character Satan, but man, God's got quite a few smitings under his belt.
- Isaac Brock, Modest Mouse
::   Blog  ::   Photos  ::   Europe  ::   Books  ::   Articles  ::   Links  ::   Friends  ::   Combo Feed  ::   Mobile  ::    
Submit a story!
Need Help?

Powered by FeedBlitz

Most Popular
Download This American Life Episodes
An Experiment in Porn
Fuck For Forest
Carnival Of The Green #18
Japan and Atomic Bomb Effects

Random Entries:
Yo Rummy!
Cattle Mistreatment Leads To Beef Recall
Resolution
Fancy methods of contraception
Valentine's Day - Clash of Cultures

World Food/Slow Food
Globalization of Food and Agriculture
NAIS? Ridiculous.
Jalapenos and Salmonella - Same Old Story?
The Effects of Globalization on Developing World Agricultural Systems
GB #7 - Pesticide Contamination
London Restaurants

Recent Comments:
My First Complaint To President Elect Obama - No RFK at EPA
Congratulations, Mr. President Elect
NAIS? Ridiculous.
Ha Ha! Fruit Fly Research! Stupid Scientists!
McCain - Pallin' Around With Militia Group Arms Suppliers
Add me to your buddy list Send me an instant message
Link to Me!
george-at-dirtygreek.org george-at-dirtygreek.org



My Photos
Gallery RSS
My Flickr Photos
Syndicate Me!

Locations of visitors to this page
Register to Vote!
Dirty Greek - Ralph's Response
  Politics : Ralph's Response
You are NOT on the DirtyGreek.Org homepage. Please CLICK HERE to go there.

As I said earlier, I don't think that Ralph Nader is going to be a problem in the fight to depose George Bush. In fact, I even think that he might help. I fully support Ralph, and anyone who votes for him has my respect. I won't be voting for Ralph this election, simply because I want to help get W. out of office.

Also, I want to help Ralph out a bit by trying to stop the smear-campaign against him. So, here's some blips from the Vote Nader website.
"Did Ralph cost Al Gore the election in 2000?
No.

Al Gore won the election in 2000.

George W. Bush cost Al Gore the election.
A very good point. I also love his stance on most of the issues:
"Wants to end the war on drugs.
The drug war has failed. We spend nearly $50 billion annually on the drug war and problems related to drug abuse continue to worsen. We need to acknowledge that drug abuse is a health problem with social and economic consequences. Therefore, the solutions are public health, social services and economic development and tender supportive time with addicts in our depersonalized society. Law enforcement should be at the edges of drug control not at the center. It is time to bring some illegal drugs within the law by regulating, taxing and controlling them. Ending the drug war will dramatically reduce street crime, violence and homicides related to underground drug dealing.

Environment
The epidemic of silent environmental violence continues. Whether it is the 65,000 Americans who die every year from air pollution, or the 80,000 estimated annual fatalities from hospital malpractice, or the 100,000 Americans whose demise comes from occupational toxic exposures or the cruel environmental racism where the poor and their often asthmatic children live in pollution sinks located near toxic hot spots that are never situated in shrubbered suburbs, to cite a few preventable conditions. Now, as the evidence of global warming mounts it is evident that we threaten the global environment with tremendous economic threats facing humanity including bankrupting the reinsurance industry, the spread of infectious tropical diseases, massive ecological disruption and increased severe and unpredictable weather, all of which will significantly impact commerce, agriculture and communities across America. Toxic standards need to be strengthened. Currently toxic standards are designed for adults not for more vulnerable children, this should be reversed. We need to make environmental protection a priority for our energy, trade, industrial, agricultural, transportation, development and land use policies, indeed protecting the environment must be weaved throughout our governance.

Wants to create a new energy policy
We urge a new clean energy policy that no longer subsidizes entrenched oil, nuclear, electric and coal mining interests -- an energy policy that is efficient, sustainable and environmentally friendly. We need to invest in a diversified energy policy including renewable energy like wind and other forms of solar power, more efficient automobiles, homes and businesses one that breaks our addiction to oil, coal and atomic power. A new clean energy paradigm means more jobs, more efficiency, greater security, environmental protection and increased health.
Of course, a candidate like Ralph doesn't stand a chance in the current environment, but I sure as hell respect him. So, Mr. Nader, for what it's worth, you have my blessing.
Posted By George on 05/19/2005 @ 03:30 PM | Link and Discuss (0) | More
Share And Enjoy: Post To Del.icio.us Post To Socialposter.com Post To Digg Post To Furl Post To Reddit Post To Technorati Post To Blinklist Post To Stumbleupon Post To Twitter Post To Google Bookmarks Post To Pownce Post To NewsVine Post To Microsoft Live Email To A Friend


My Related Posts: Kerrying on about the wrong guy // Del.icio.us Links // GB #17 - Favorite Blogathon Posts So Far // More Flag-Draped Coffins // Iraqis Accused Of Torture //
No Comments
Name
Email
Subject
  Security Image
 
Comment