Why should we hear about body bags and deaths and how many, what day it's gonna happen? It's not relevant. So why should I waste my beautiful mind on something like that?
- Barbara Bush
::   Blog  ::   Photos  ::   Europe  ::   Books  ::   Articles  ::   Links  ::   Friends  ::   Combo Feed  ::   Mobile  ::    
Submit a story!
Need Help?

Powered by FeedBlitz

Most Popular
Download This American Life Episodes
An Experiment in Porn
Fuck For Forest
Carnival Of The Green #18
Japan and Atomic Bomb Effects

Random Entries:
Speechwriters Lauded Their Own Speech
Valentine's Day - Clash of Cultures
The Iraqis have lived this lie before
Doomsday
Howard Zinn on pulling out

World Food/Slow Food
Globalization of Food and Agriculture
NAIS? Ridiculous.
Jalapenos and Salmonella - Same Old Story?
The Effects of Globalization on Developing World Agricultural Systems
GB #7 - Pesticide Contamination
London Restaurants

Recent Comments:
My First Complaint To President Elect Obama - No RFK at EPA
Congratulations, Mr. President Elect
NAIS? Ridiculous.
Ha Ha! Fruit Fly Research! Stupid Scientists!
McCain - Pallin' Around With Militia Group Arms Suppliers
Add me to your buddy list Send me an instant message
Link to Me!
george-at-dirtygreek.org george-at-dirtygreek.org



My Photos
Gallery RSS
My Flickr Photos
Syndicate Me!

Locations of visitors to this page
Register to Vote!
Dirty Greek - A Bill To... What?
  Humor : A Bill To... What?
You are NOT on the DirtyGreek.Org homepage. Please CLICK HERE to go there.

What we have here is a failure to understand an important idea.

CHECKS AND BALANCES?

"IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

March 9, 2004


Mr. Lewis of Kentucky (for himself, Mr. DeMint, Mr. Everett, Mr. Pombo, Mr. Coble, Mr. Collins, Mr. Goode, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Hefley, Mr. Doolittle, and Mr. Kingston) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

----------

A BILL

To allow Congress to reverse the judgments of the United States Supreme Court.


Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Congressional Accountability for Judicial Activism Act of 2004”.

SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL REVERSAL OF SUPREME COURT JUDGMENTS.

The Congress may, if two thirds of each House agree, reverse a judgment of the United States Supreme Court—

(1) if that judgment is handed down after the date of the enactment of this Act; and

(2) to the extent that judgment concerns the constitutionality of an Act of Congress.

SEC. 3. PROCEDURE.

The procedure for reversing a judgment under section 2 shall be, as near as may be and consistent with the authority of each House of Congress to adopt its own rules of proceeding, the same as that used for considering whether or not to override a veto of legislation by the President.

SEC. 4. BASIS FOR ENACTMENT.

This Act is enacted pursuant to the power of Congress under article III, section 2, of the Constitution of the United States.
You'll note that this is in the humor section... though it's actually not very funny.
Posted By George on 05/19/2005 @ 03:29 PM | Link and Discuss (0) | More
Share And Enjoy: Post To Del.icio.us Post To Socialposter.com Post To Digg Post To Furl Post To Reddit Post To Technorati Post To Blinklist Post To Stumbleupon Post To Twitter Post To Google Bookmarks Post To Pownce Post To NewsVine Post To Microsoft Live Email To A Friend


My Related Posts: Sarin gas found in Iraq? // At the Left Hand of God // Senate Passes Pop The Cap! // American officials charged with war crimes // How long will a draft card burn in open air? //
No Comments
Name
Email
Subject
  Security Image
 
Comment