If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual gay sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything. All of those things are antithetical to a healthy, stable, traditional family and that's sort of where we are in today's world, unfortunately. It all comes from, I would argue, the right to privacy that doesn't exist, in my opinion, in the United States Constitution.
- Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA)
::   Blog  ::   Photos  ::   Europe  ::   Books  ::   Articles  ::   Links  ::   Friends  ::   Combo Feed  ::   Mobile  ::    
Submit a story!
Need Help?

Powered by FeedBlitz

Most Popular
Download This American Life Episodes
An Experiment in Porn
Fuck For Forest
Carnival Of The Green #18
Japan and Atomic Bomb Effects

Random Entries:
My Day Canvassing For Obama
Paul Johnson
More On Obama's Very Large Electoral Lead
Egg in the face
Institutionalized Homophobia

World Food/Slow Food
Globalization of Food and Agriculture
NAIS? Ridiculous.
Jalapenos and Salmonella - Same Old Story?
The Effects of Globalization on Developing World Agricultural Systems
GB #7 - Pesticide Contamination
London Restaurants

Recent Comments:
On Proposition 8 and Gay Marriage
My First Complaint To President Elect Obama - No RFK at EPA
Congratulations, Mr. President Elect
NAIS? Ridiculous.
Ha Ha! Fruit Fly Research! Stupid Scientists!
george-at-dirtygreek.org george-at-dirtygreek.org



My Photos
Gallery RSS
My Flickr Photos
Syndicate Me!

Dirty Greek - Richard Clark'es Interview
  War : Richard Clark'es Interview
You are NOT on the DirtyGreek.Org homepage. Please CLICK HERE to go there.

Well, I just watched the interview, and I have to say that what Clarke has is very damning. From the interview
""The president dragged me into a room with a couple of other people, shut the door, and said, 'I want you to find whether Iraq did this.' Now he never said, 'Make it up.' But the entire conversation left me in absolutely no doubt that George Bush wanted me to come back with a report that said Iraq did this.
"I said, 'Mr. President. We've done this before. We have been looking at this. We looked at it with an open mind. There's no connection.'

"He came back at me and said, "Iraq! Saddam! Find out if there's a connection.' And in a very intimidating way. I mean that we should come back with that answer. We wrote a report."

Clarke continued, "It was a serious look. We got together all the FBI experts, all the CIA experts. We wrote the report. We sent the report out to CIA and found FBI and said, 'Will you sign this report?' They all cleared the report. And we sent it up to the president and it got bounced by the National Security Advisor or Deputy. It got bounced and sent back saying, 'Wrong answer. ... Do it again.'

"I have no idea, to this day, if the President saw it, because after we did it again, it came to the same conclusion. And frankly, I don't think the people around the president show him memos like that. I don't think he sees memos that he doesn't-- wouldn't like the answer."
Some highlights:

1.) Clarke claims to be independent, and worked with the Reagan, Bush Senior, Clinton, and Bush Jr. administrations as a head terrorism official.

2.) He says that he repeatedly asked for a cabinet-level meeting with Bush's cabinet on the subject of Al Queda, and tried his best to ensure that Al Queda and terrorism were their main security concerns. However, the White House continued to ignore him.

3.) He finally got his meeting - one week before 9/11.

4.) The day after 9/11, Rumsfeld is reportedly quoted by Clarke as saying they should "bomb Iraq."

5.) Bush is reported as telling Clarke to "find a connection between Saddam and Al Queda. When Clarke redid his research and still found no connections, he was told to go back and check again. He says he doubts that Bush's advisors ever even told him news that he wouldn't like.

6.) The No. 2 man on the president's National Security Council, Stephen Hadley, was on 60 Minutes as well, pulling for the administration. However, his evidence that Clarke wasn't giving accurate information was:
A.) Clarke is angry that he was a Cabinet-level official in Clinton's administration, but was demoted to a non-cabinet level in GW's administration.

B.) Clarke is trying to get a job on the Kerry administration by publishing his book and tearing Bush apart.
Of course, none of this is valid reasoning to think that Clarke is lying, but then Hadley goes on to say that he has found no evidence that Bush and Clarke's meeting in which Bush "intimidatingly" told him to "find a link" ever happened. His look of sheer horror when Leslie Stahl tells him that they did a bit of their own research and found an eye-witness to the conversation and another person who knew the conversation took place, Hadley responded "Look, I stand on what I said."

7.) On whether or not the administration ignored Clarke's warnings and never even cared about Al Queda until 9/11, Hadley gives us the well-backed-up response that Clarke is "just wrong."

By the way, Stahl played a great game of "suck the President's dick" during the interview. After half of the interview was over, and Clarke had given all of this damning evidence that the President and his advisors had ignored the Al Queda threat, Clarke says that the President risked American lives.

Stahl responds "You think the President risked American lives???"
But, to be fair, it made her look more objective towards the subject.
Posted By George on 05/19/2005 @ 03:29 PM | Link and Discuss (0) | More
Share And Enjoy: Post To Del.icio.us Post To Socialposter.com Post To Digg Post To Furl Post To Reddit Post To Technorati Post To Blinklist Post To Stumbleupon Post To Twitter Post To Google Bookmarks Post To Pownce Post To NewsVine Post To Microsoft Live Email To A Friend


My Related Posts: GB #8 - Globalization's Effects On Economies // Next Ridiculous State Law To Go - Cohabitation // Search Term Update // When good news backfires: Gadhafi urges end to WMD // John Negroponte Answers Your Questions //
No Comments
Name
Email
Subject
  Security Image
 
Comment