You are NOT on the DirtyGreek.Org homepage. Please CLICK HERE to go there.
Condoleeza Rice was going to give a speech on 9/11 that was to focus mainly on missile defense and other Reaganesque points - NOT Islamic terrorism. I repeat - NOT Islamic terrorism.| "The speech provides telling insight into the administration's thinking on the very day that the United States suffered the most devastating attack since the 1941 bombing of Pearl Harbor. The address was designed to promote missile defense as the cornerstone of a new national security strategy, and contained no mention of al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden or Islamic extremist groups, according to former U.S. officials who have seen the text. |
Of course, who were they blaming for this 'obsession with terrorism?'| "In the speech prepared for Sept. 11, Rice intended to point out that the United States had spent $11 billion on counterterrorism, about twice as much as it spent on missile defense, during the previous year, although the speech did not point out that that was when President Bill Clinton was still in office. |
Well, Condi? I think there are alot of questions you're going to have to answer during your 9/11 Commission testimony."In April 2002, Rice followed through on her postponed Sept. 11 speaking engagement at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University. But the speech she delivered did not contain any of the original text, former U.S. officials said.
In the revamped speech, Rice's focus was on the threat of international terrorists -- and missile defense was mentioned only once, almost in passing.
"An earthquake of the magnitude of 9/11 can shift the tectonic plates of international politics," she noted. |
Well played, guys. Well played.
Let's try a conspiracy theory. What if they released this just now, in order to make sure nobody continues to think they knew about 9/11 before hand? That way, they look bad, but nowhere NEAR as bad as they might have. I doubt that's the case... but it's fair enough, wouldn't you say?
|