Why deliberately go poking around among nasty, disreputable ideas? Why look under rocks? I do it, first of all, for the same reason I did look under rocks as a kid: plain curiosity. And I'm especially curious about anything that's forbidden... And you especially need a brain that's in the habit of going where it's not supposed to.
- Paul Graham
::   Blog  ::   Photos  ::   Europe  ::   Books  ::   Articles  ::   Links  ::   Friends  ::   Combo Feed  ::   Mobile  ::    
Submit a story!
Need Help?

Powered by FeedBlitz

Most Popular
Download This American Life Episodes
An Experiment in Porn
Fuck For Forest
Japan and Atomic Bomb Effects
Carnival Of The Green #18

Random Entries:
Daily Show Last Night
Military Draft Looking for Computer and Language Skills
WMD hunt officially over
Raed gives us a breakdown of Iraqi culture
An occupation gone sour

World Food/Slow Food
Globalization of Food and Agriculture
NAIS? Ridiculous.
Jalapenos and Salmonella - Same Old Story?
The Effects of Globalization on Developing World Agricultural Systems
Industrial Agriculture and Vertical Integration
London Restaurants

Recent Comments:
Spongebob is Such a Homo!
Leash gal sex pics
The Consistency Of Inconsistency or "Hope and Change"
Search Terms
Geeky Gardening
george-at-dirtygreek.org george-at-dirtygreek.org

Twitter / DirtyGreek
Follow DirtyGreek on Twitter

My Photos
Gallery RSS
My Flickr Photos
Syndicate Me!
Dirty Greek - Derrick Jensen
  Culture Critique : Derrick Jensen
You are NOT on the DirtyGreek.Org homepage. Please CLICK HERE to go there.

Disclaimer: I don't agree with everything Jensen says here, I just find some of it humorous, some of it insightful, and some of it agreeable. I'll let you decide for yourself.

--------------------------------------------

Printed in the Ecologist (March 2004). It's what was meant to be a quick and easy five best books Q&A with Jensen, but this is better in my opinion...

Question one: Which book first made you realise that something was wrong (with the planet/political system/economic system, etc)?

My answer: It wasn’t a book. It was the destruction of place after place that I loved. And it was the complete insanity of a culture where so many people work at jobs they hate: What does it mean when the vast majority of people spend the vast majority of their waking hours doing things they’d rather not do? The culture itself convinced me something was wrong, by being so extraordinarily destructive, of human happiness, and far more importantly, the world itself.

That said, Neil Evernden’s The Natural Alien was the first book I read that let me know I was not insane: that the culture is insane. It was the first book I read that did not take the dominant culture’s utilitarian worldview as a given.

Question two: Which one book would you give to every politician?

Answer: One that explodes.

Before you freak out, let’s change the question and see what you think: Which one book would you give to Hitler, Goering, Himmler, and Goebbels?

Let’s ask this another way: Would a book have changed Hitler? I don’t think so. Unless it exploded.

And before you freak out at the comparison of modern politicians to Hitler and his gang, try to look at it from the perspective of wild salmon, grizzly bears, bluefin tuna, or any of the (fiscally) poor or indigenous human beings. Those in power now are more destructive than anyone has ever been. And they are for the most part psychologically unreachable. And if someone does reach some politician, that politician will no longer be in power.

I recently shared a stage with Ward Chuchill. He said the primary difference between the U.S. and the Nazis is that the U.S. didn’t lose.

I responded with one word: “Yet.”

Question three: What book would you give to every CEO?

Answer: See above.

Queston four: What book would you give to every child?
Answer: I wouldn’t give them a book. Books are part of the problem: this strange belief that a tree has nothing to say until it is murdered, its flesh pulped, and then (human) people stain this flesh with words. I would take children outside, and put them face to face with chipmunks, dragonflies, tadpoles, hummingbirds, stones, rivers, trees, crawdads.

That said, if you’re going to force me to give them a book, it would be The Wind in the Willows, which would I hope remind them to go outside.

Question five: It’s 2050. The ice caps are melting, sea levels are rising. You’re only allowed one book on the Ark. What is it?

Answer: I wouldn’t take a book,and I wouldn’t get on the ark. I would kill myself (and take a dam out with me). I do not want to live without a living landbase. Without a living landbase I would already be dead. No book would even remotely compensate. Not a million books. Not a million computers. Not a million people would compensate.

----------------------------------------

Derrick Jensen web site
Posted By George on 06/02/2004 @ 02:03 AM | Link and Discuss (0) | More CultureCritique
Share And Enjoy: Post To Del.icio.us Post To Socialposter.com Post To Digg Post To Reddit Post To Technorati Post To Blinklist Post To Stumbleupon Post To Twitter Post To Google Bookmarks Post To NewsVine Post To Microsoft Live Email To A Friend

My Related Posts: All I can say about tonight's coverage // Agent Orange // TPM: Torture Used to Get Evidence of Saddam - Al Queda Link // Atrios insults me indirectly // Garden Update - Peppers, Beans, Tomatoes, Eggplant, Squash, Cukes //
No Comments
Name
Email
Subject
  Security Image
 
Comment