If we are saying that the loss of species in and of itself is inherently bad -- I don't think we know enough about how the world works to say that.
- Craig Manson, appointed by President Bush to position overseeing the Endangered Species Act
::   Blog  ::   Photos  ::   Europe  ::   Books  ::   Articles  ::   Links  ::   Friends  ::   Combo Feed  ::   Mobile  ::    
Submit a story!
Need Help?

Powered by FeedBlitz

Most Popular
Download This American Life Episodes
An Experiment in Porn
Fuck For Forest
Carnival Of The Green #18
Japan and Atomic Bomb Effects

Random Entries:
A Pattern Language, Patterns 1-20
Inspectors: Iraq war "unjustified"
O'Reilly Apologizes, is "Skeptical" about Bush
OMG! Liberal Media Has Silenced Cookie Monster!
Happy July 4

World Food/Slow Food
Globalization of Food and Agriculture
NAIS? Ridiculous.
Jalapenos and Salmonella - Same Old Story?
The Effects of Globalization on Developing World Agricultural Systems
GB #7 - Pesticide Contamination
London Restaurants

Recent Comments:
My First Complaint To President Elect Obama - No RFK at EPA
Congratulations, Mr. President Elect
NAIS? Ridiculous.
Ha Ha! Fruit Fly Research! Stupid Scientists!
McCain - Pallin' Around With Militia Group Arms Suppliers
george-at-dirtygreek.org george-at-dirtygreek.org



My Photos
Gallery RSS
My Flickr Photos
Syndicate Me!

Dirty Greek - E-Voting
  Politics : E-Voting
You are NOT on the DirtyGreek.Org homepage. Please CLICK HERE to go there.

Via Wired:
"It was simultaneously an uh-oh moment and an ah-ha moment.

When Sequoia Voting Systems demonstrated its new paper-trail electronic voting system for state Senate staffers in California last week, the company representative got a surprise when the paper trail failed to record votes that testers cast on the machine.

That was bad news for the voting company, whose paper-trail, touch-screen machine will be used for the first time next month in Nevada's state primary. The company advertises that its touch-screen machines provide "nothing less than 100 percent accuracy."

It was good news, however, for computer scientists and voting activists, who have long held that touch-screen machines are unreliable and vulnerable to tampering, and therefore must provide a physical paper-based audit trail of votes.
You know, this is just another example of why e-voting is an awful idea. I'm all for the idea of it, actually, but in reality it's way too prone to tampering. The thing is, no matter what, you can't really make it secure even WITH a paper trail. Think about it - even if the machine prints out for you the same thing that it showed on the screen, it could still only be printing that out then recording the vote you made as something else. A paper trail is just a false sense of security; it means nothing in reality.

For this system, I'd feel far more comfortable with standard voting methods.
Posted By George on 05/19/2005 @ 03:29 PM | Link and Discuss (0) | More
Share And Enjoy: Post To Del.icio.us Post To Socialposter.com Post To Digg Post To Furl Post To Reddit Post To Technorati Post To Blinklist Post To Stumbleupon Post To Twitter Post To Google Bookmarks Post To Pownce Post To NewsVine Post To Microsoft Live Email To A Friend


My Related Posts: How Sweet! // A Bill To... What? // Tarheel Tavern // Rumsfeld can't go to Germany // Advertise On Green Blogs or Get Ads On Yours //
No Comments
Name
Email
Subject
  Security Image
 
Comment