You are NOT on the DirtyGreek.Org homepage. Please CLICK HERE to go there.
Two posts down, here's another guy who's just itching to start World War III, Mr. David C. Atkins. However, this time he's just looking to get the entire planet nuked."Back in the days of the Cold War, the U.S. had a nuclear-weapons doctrine called Mutual Assured Destruction, or MAD for short. This doctrine held that if the U.S. were attacked with weapons of mass destruction, or WMD, we would immediately and without debate counter-attack the homeland of the perpetrator in such a way and with such overwhelming nuclear force as to make the cost of the initial attack too much to bear.
For instance, if the Soviet Union or the Chinese would have attacked us with WMD in the Cold War, we would have counter-attacked at the very least by destroying their 100 largest cities. The theory was that once you have destroyed the 100 largest cities of any society, even an evil empire, that society effectively ceases to exist, perhaps for several generations, thus deterring any WMD attack. Variations of this same nuclear doctrine were held by our Cold War allies and advisories, including the evil empire. |
Phew. Good thing that's in the past, right? Well, not if Mr. Atkins has anything to do with it!"I propose that the U.S. immediately adopt and publish the following nuclear doctrine:
In the event of a WMD attack by terrorists on the U.S. homeland or U.S. military facilities overseas, the U.S will immediately and without discussion use its immense nuclear weapons capabilities to destroy the 100 largest Islamic cities on earth, regardless of state, and destroy all of the military facilities of Islamic-dominated states. This will include all of the capitals and at least the 10 largest cities of all Islamic-dominated states and the "holy" cities of Mecca and Medina. In addition, North Korean cities and military installations will be destroyed.
Now suddenly everybody from Casablanca, Cairo, Damascus, Riyadh, Tehran, Islamabad, Pyongyang and Jakarta have skin in the game. The last thing they want would be a WMD attack on the U.S. It would mean certain destruction of their societies. They might even be motivated to actually and feverishly work against Islamic terrorism instead of the tepid lip service they currently give. Those "freedom fighters" currently being cheered in the streets would be transformed to deadly threats in the very societies that spawned them. |
I sent Mr. Atkins an email in response to his column:
Mr. Atkins,
YEAH! THAT'LL MAKE 'EM THINK! Those non-thinking, itchy-trigger-finger terrorists who are so indoctrinated that they think a suicide bomb attack will bring them 70 virgins in heaven will certainly stop to consider the results of their actions if we threaten to retaliate by nuking 100 Islamic cities! And, since the terrorists aren't usually working for any particular government, we'll just get to nuke every Islamic city we can get ahold of, without any reason to stop!
Of course, then any other Islamic country with nukes (and probably China and Russia as well) would band together to nuke a good portion of the U.S. We'd follow suit by nuking them and, well, I guess after all that terrorism wouldn't be much of a problem anymore.
Albert Einsteion is quoted as saying "I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."
That would rule!
I would usually give a journal (`entry_id`,`time`,`title`,`body`,`topic`,`description`,`delicious`) ist the benefit of the doubt and assume that he had done his research and knew what he was talking about. However, you sir are a nutcase.
Sincerely,
George Peterson
http://www.dirtygreek.org
|