Liquor stores and churches, there's one on every corner. Thanks for all my daily bread - a can of food, bottle of wine, and a 99 cent pack of cigarettes.
The most powerful solar flare in four years exploded over the sun late Monday, according to NASA.
The magnetic instability that caused the flare also unleashed a blast of charged particles that should hit Earth's atmosphere tonight, possibly sparking auroras farther south than usual, experts say.
Like a prairie with no more vacant land to homestead or a hip area code with no more cellphone numbers, the pool of available numeric internet addresses has been completely allocated as of Thursday (pdf).
A new breed of conspiracy theorists, which I'm calling the IPv6ers, were born today. A commenter on the Wired article replied with "Yeah right! And the tooth fairy is real!"
here were two silent calls, followed by a message left on my voicemail. She had a soft, gentle voice and a mid-Wales accent. "You are a liar, Mr Monbiot. You and James Hansen and all your lying colleagues. I'm going to make you pay back the money my son gave to your causes. It's minus 18C and my pipes have frozen. You liar. Is this your global warming?" She's not going to like the answer, and nor are you. It may be yes.
There is now strong evidence to suggest that the unusually cold winters of the last two years in the UK are the result of heating elsewhere. With the help of the severe weather analyst John Mason and the Climate Science Rapid Response Team, I've been through as much of the scientific literature as I can lay hands on (see my website for the references). Here's what seems to be happening.
The global temperature maps published by Nasa present a striking picture. Last month's shows a deep blue splodge over Iceland, Spitsbergen, Scandanavia and the UK, and another over the western US and eastern Pacific. Temperatures in these regions were between 0.5C and 4C colder than the November average from 1951 and 1980. But on either side of these cool blue pools are raging fires of orange, red and maroon: the temperatures in western Greenland, northern Canada and Siberia were between 2C and 10C higher than usual. Nasa's Arctic oscillations map for 3-10 December shows that parts of Baffin Island and central Greenland were 15C warmer than the average for 2002-9. There was a similar pattern last winter. These anomalies appear to be connected.
The weather we get in UK winters, for example, is strongly linked to the contrasting pressure between the Icelandic low and the Azores high. When there's a big pressure difference the winds come in from the south-west, bringing mild damp weather from the Atlantic. When there's a smaller gradient, air is often able to flow down from the Arctic. High pressure in the icy north last winter, according to the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, blocked the usual pattern and "allowed cold air from the Arctic to penetrate all the way into Europe, eastern China, and Washington DC". Nasa reports that the same thing is happening this winter.
Religion : America Is Trending The Right Way - More Believe In Evolution, Less In God
You will no longer see new posts on this page. New posts will appear here
The number of people who believe humans evolved, but with god's help, is about to surpass number of people who don't believe in evolution for the first time ever. Keep this trend up, America!
The correlation between education, faith, and evolution knowledge is always fascinating.
Also interestingly, there are more atheist independents than democrats:
I hope to see these trends continue. First step - let's get that black line crossing over the light green line... then we can work on getting the dark green line to take over.
Politics : Daily Show: 9/11 First Responders React to the Senate Filibuster
You will no longer see new posts on this page. New posts will appear here
This is one of the most powerful moments from this show that I've seen in a long time. It's an absolute shame and so depressing to see Kyl say on the Senate floor that it's disrespectful to be asked to work on this between Christmas and New Years when these men work through all holidays every year, including Christmas 2001 cleaning up the mess left behind by the 9/11 disaster. Shame on anyone who isn't willing to give up vacation time to help these men.
Politics : I'm not saying I think it would or would not be a good thing, but
You will no longer see new posts on this page. New posts will appear here
Can anyone explain to me why it makes more economic (or moral, or both, or other) sense to bail out Irish banks to the tune of $25,000 per citizen instead of giving some or all of that money to the citizens, small businesses, schools, etc?
Science : Symphony Of Science- A Wave of Reason - Dawkins, Plait, Feynman, Sagan
You will no longer see new posts on this page. New posts will appear here
A Wave of Reason" is the seventh installment in the Symphony of Science music video series. It is intended to promote scientific reasoning and skepticism in the face of growing amounts of pseudoscientific pursuits, such as Astrology and Homeopathy, and also to promote the scientific worldview as equally enlightening as religion. It features Carl Sagan, Bertrand Russell, Sam Harris, Michael Shermer, Lawrence Krauss, Carolyn Porco, Richard Dawkins, Richard Feynman, Phil Plait, and James Randi.
Today, you’re in charge of the nation’s finances. Some of your options have more short-term savings and some have more long-term savings. When you have closed the budget gaps for both 2015 and 2030, you are done. Make your own plan, then share it online.
I opted to do the following (78% savings from tax increases, 22% from spending cuts):
Eliminate Earmarks - $14 Billion in savings by 2030
Reduce military to pre-Iraq War size and further reduce troops in Asia and Europe - $49 Billion
Reduce Navy and Air Force fleets - $24 Billion
Cancel or delay some weapons programs - $18 billion
Reduce the number of troops in Iraq and Afghanistan to 30,000 by 2013 - $169 billion
Return the estate tax to Clinton-era levels - $104 Billion
Return rates to Clinton-era levels - $46 billion
Allow expiration for income above $250,000 a year - $115 Billion
Payroll tax: Subject some incomes above $106,000 to tax - $100 Billion
Millionaire's tax on income above $1 million - $95 Billion
Of course, it's probably pre-programmed to make it look like liberal ideas are better... Try it yourself here. The best thing about it is that if you try to only use Republican ideas, you don't manage to fix the deficit unless you do something drastic like raise the retirement age to 70. Even then, you only solve it by 2030 but are still billions off for 2015. You have to use at least some liberal ideas to pull it off. Start out by pulling us out of Iraq and Afghanistan, then get rid of tax cuts for the rich, and you're well on your way.
Here's a more bipartisan plan, which involves 41% savings from tax increases and 59% from spending cuts. It attempts to avoid cutting jobs but still trim fat from some programs. It does involve cutting pay to federal workers by 5%, cutting aide to states by 5%, cutting foreign aide in half, medical malpractice reform, increasing medicare eligibility to 70, and raising the retirement age to 68. However, it also gets us out of Iraq and Afghanistan, eliminates the wealthy tax cuts, Clinton-era estate taxes, Obama's income tax plan, carbon tax, and eliminating tax loopholes.
One more bipartisan plan more heavily favors taxes (64% taxes and 36% spending cuts), but only because it uses a national sales tax to allow Medicare and Social Security to stay mostly as they are now while also avoiding cuts to state aid and federal employee pay. If this exercise has taught me anything, it's that a national sales tax might be a really great idea...
Last month, NASA reported it was the hottest January-September on record. That followed a terrific analysis, “July 2010 — What Global Warming Looks Like,” which noted that 2010 is “likely” to be warmest year on record.
This month continues the trend of 2010 outpacing previous years, according to NASA:
Alex Witze did a great job covering this talk that Penn State climate scientist Michael Mann gave at the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing meeting on Sunday.
Here are a few other of his more pointed statements from that talk:
“No doubt we are in for a period over next months or even years where climate science is likely to be subject to the sort of politically motivated inquisition that we frankly haven’t seen in this country since the 1950s and it is of course necessary not only for the science community to do the best that it can to defend itself from this attack but frankly we are entirely reliant on willingness of mainstream media to serve in its role as a critical and independent arbiter to not just report the two sides of this so-called debate but to establish what is fact and what is fiction. Scientists will not be successful in their own attacks coming unless the media is serving its role.”
He added that we must “draw those analogies [to 1950s McCarthyism and its blacklisting campaigns] where they are appropriate. I think they are relevant and legitimate.”
And re: the Virginia AG’s efforts to get his hands on the climate scientists’ data, Mann noted that the data are already available to the public. He added that the attorney general “wouldn’t know what to do with data if he was given it. He doesn’t want any materials that relate to science and the conduct of science. He is looking to get hold of more private correspondences between scientists, emails written documents, that they can again mine for individual phrases that can be used to distort what climate scientists believe and say in their ongoing campaign to fool the public about reality of human caused climate change.”
Think Progress has some more on the right's plans to prevent any new work from being done on climate change.
Rove’s pronouncement that the “climate is gone” may be more accurate than he realizes. The Geological Society of London is warning that the planet will take 100,000 years to recover from man’s global warming pollution, the permanently warmer Arctic is altering weather patterns across the Northern Hemisphere, and scientists continue to warn that global policy ambitions — if the United States even acted — are likely too weak to avoid catastrophe.
You will no longer see new posts on this page. New posts will appear here
This... this is awesome.
Yes, many of those thinkers to whom I owe my mental freedom were religious, like Newton, a Christian, who believed God made the Earth but who then showed me why the Earth would have formed without a god's help. Or Plank and Schrodinger, two more Christians, who believed God ruled the Universe but showed me how God could not control a single electron. The discoveries these and many other people made, the laws they are famous for, are the very things that make gods getting humans pregnant, or angels whispering to prophets in caves, look infantile. I could never and would never question their intelligence. Their honesty and intellectual consistency are a different matter.
Weird...
I can stand on the shoulders of giants and see what even they seemingly could not.
I'm not against the Creator(s), if they exist, if they ever existed. I'm not against the search for the Creator(s). What blows MY mind is that people think religion has anything to do with it at all.
Religion : The Out Campaign - Atheists Speaking Out
You will no longer see new posts on this page. New posts will appear here
It's probably not news to anyone reading this site that I'm an atheist. The Out Campaign, spearheaded by Richard Dawkins, encourages atheists to "come out of the closet," as it were, and let it be known that there are many of us. We're a minority, but we're your family members, your coworkers, your friends, probably even your fellow churchgoers in some cases.
Just as religious people are free to speak their minds and reveal their feelings and beliefs, so are we. Atheists are the most feared and hated religious minority in America, below Muslims even, and that needs to change. There's nothing to fear from a person who doesn't believe in a god.
Politics : November 2, 2010 (Or Before) - Please Vote!
You will no longer see new posts on this page. New posts will appear here
This election is important. Obviously I'd like to see the Democrats retain the House and Senate, even though they've been so thoroughly disappointing, because the alternative is worse. Either way, however, I'd encourage you to vote. If you're hoping for the same outcome I am, then you especially need to vote, because Republicans are currently much more interested in this election than Democrats. If everyone who voted for Barack Obama and an overwhelmingly democratic House and Senate in 2008 votes the same way this year, both houses will stay blue.
If you're in North Carolina, here's some helpful information. You can start voting early NOW, either via absentee ballot or in person.
EXCLUSIVE: Michael Mann responds to Rep. Barton | Bad Astronomy | Discover Magazine I'll note that Representative Barton has the distinction of being the Congressman who received the highest amount of lobby dollars from the oil and gas industry 1.7 million dollars over the past 20 years. As Mann mentions, you may remember Barton as the Congressman who shamefully apologized to BP executive Tony Hayward after that company dumped millions of barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico (and then issued a non-apology about it).
The discovery puts back by 10 million years the colonization of land by plants, and suggests that a diversity of land plants had evolved by 472 million years ago.
Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), one of and the most senior of three openly-gay members of Congress, said the administration should wait as long as possible before deciding whether or not to appeal a federal judge's ruling against the military's prohibition on openly gay and lesbian servicemembers.
Frank urged President Obama to give lawmakers a chance to repeal the policy when they return to Washington during a lame-duck session of Congress after the elections.
"They've got 60 days. We will have the lame-duck session convene in less time than that," Frank said Tuesday evening on MSNBC. "Clearly what they should do is wait and see. I hope they don't appeal it at all, but it would be really foolish to appeal it before we can repeal it."
The judge's ruling ordered the military to immediately cease discharges of individuals under the controversial policy. The administration has 60 days to decide whether or not to appeal. The government traditionally sues to defend its policies when challenged, though the Department of Justice could opt not to pursue an appeal.
Frank argued that the administration should wait until lawmakers have a chance to act when they return on Nov. 15 -- well before the 60-day time frame is set to expire.
I mean, makes sense to me. If they want it repealed legislatively, fine, but
1.) That may not be possible and
2.) There's no reason they can't repeal it legislatively AFTER deciding against an appeal.
Can I just say, though, how crazy this is and how it will look to posterity? A REPUBLICAN group (granted, a gay republican group) sues the government because of DADT. They sued during a republican administration, but a DEMOCRATIC administration, which has constantly pledged to get rid of DADT but has failed to do so, may appeal the federal court decision that declares this law, which the democratic administration says is unconstitutional, to be unconstitutional.
General : Krugman Says More Spending Needed, Homeopathy, Evolution Exhibits
You will no longer see new posts on this page. New posts will appear here
Here are my most recent links:
Op-Ed Contributor - Hey, Small Spender - NYTimes.com The whole story is a myth. There never was a big expansion of government spending. In fact, that has been the key problem with economic policy in the Obama years: we never had the kind of fiscal expansion that might have created the millions of jobs we need.
Evolution exhibits and religion « Why Evolution Is True Why not just give folks the science and let them draw their own conclusions? If they are disturbed, they can go to their own pastor or any number of sources that deal with science and faith. I take the Jack Webb approach to evolution exhibits: All we want is the science, maam
Two things are clear if you visit America’s leading “science museum” — the National Museum of Natural History. First, the Smithsonian downplays or ignores the risks posed by human-caused climate change in a number of exhibits. Second, the worst of the exhibit is the David H. Koch Hall of Human Origins.
Yes, the Smithsonian took $15 million from a billionaire polluter — who is an even bigger funder of disinformation on climate science than Exxon Mobil — to fund a misleading exhibit on evolution and climate change. See also the new Think Progress post “A ‘Grateful’ Smithsonian Denies Greenwashing ‘Philanthropist’ David H. Koch’s Dirty Money.”
I don't even know what to think. I've always admired the Smithsonian for being a bastion of government-funded scientific truth. I'm sad, but I guess not surprised, to find that's not really true.
The really interesting thing here, aside from the dirty money and political trickery, is that this seems to indicate that major conservatives might be willing to drop opposition to evolution, maybe even support it, in order to advance an anti-climate change agenda. It'll be interesting to follow this.
Politics : Gizmodo Promoting Right-Wing Propaganda As A "Deal" - UPDATED
You will no longer see new posts on this page. New posts will appear here
Gizmodo's Gadget Deals Of The Day usually has a mix of good and pointless deals, but today's post takes the cake. In the list, along with televisions, computer hardware, free cookies, and astroglide samples, they have Rules For Patriots Handbook listed.
Now, maybe they don't know what that is and assumed it was just some harmless patriotic materials, but if that's the case, they were fooled. Rules For Patriots is created by FreedomWorks, who describe the propaganda as follows:
inally presents a principled, conservative answer to the progressive movement's "community organizing" tactics. Please read it and use it to help FreedomWorks defeat the Left in the elections and beyond.
Click here to order bulk quantities of our Rules for Patriots Handbook.
If we are to succeed, we need your help. It's crucial that you step above and beyond being just a Tea Party participant and take the lead by becoming a FreedomWorks Sponsoring Member today.
There's a lovely photo on the page of Glenn Beck, with a quote (almost definitely a paid-for quote) that says "FreedomWorks is the best in the business at grassroots organizing." Of course, FreedomWorks is actually an astroturf group.
FreedomWorks is primarily funded by individual donations. According to the media watchdog group Media Matters for America, FreedomWorks has also received funding from Verizon and SBC (now AT&T).[10] Other FreedomWorks funders have included Philip Morris and foundations controlled by the Scaife family, according to tax filings and other records.[11][12] It also receives funding through the sale of insurance policies through which policyholders automatically become members of FreedomWorks.[13]
FreedomWorks is closely tied to its founder, corporate lobbyist and former Republican Congressman Dick Armey, whose former lobbying firm DLA Piper from which he resigned in August 2009, represents Bristol Myers Squibb, among other pharmaceutical companies.[6][14]
The Koch family foundations were the largest donors to FreedomWorks' parent organization, Citizens for a Sound Economy, contributing nearly $13 million between 1985 and 2005.[15] Since then, FreedomWorks has received no funding from the Koch family or foundations.[16]
It's disturbing that Gizmodo is promoting this nonsense... but deleting very appropriate comments that point out that this is corporate-funded, right-wing propaganda and has nothing to do with "patriotism." They deleted mine... Maybe if you all go explain it to them in the comments section, they'll remove the link. There's only one way to find out...
UPDATE: They did not actually delete my comments. They were just hidden based on whatever rules they use. You can still see them if you "show all discussions."
Do you think a baby conceived in test tube is still a child in the... eyes -- or mind or hands, depending on your theology/philosophy -- of God? Does the science behind this merit the Nobel Prize for Medicine or condemnation in the realm of faith and ethics?"
I find it disturbing that some people consider the circumstances of a child's conception to be serious grounds for contemplating their status as members of the human race. This is where magical thinking about undetectable spiritual entities leads you — to a different kind of dualism, where I am privileged because I've imagined that I'm granted a soul, while you are lesser because I've imagined that you have not…and by the way, you have no means to challenge my claims, which are entirely ethereal and supernatural and also accepted by the majority of the law makers and enforcers in my country.
And it's incredibly offensive to go further and suggest that the parents of these children, who have gone to extraordinary expense and trouble to conceive, are mere "shoppers", as if people who get pregnant in a casual evening's rut are somehow necessarily conscientious ethical philosophers and serious about their children, while someone who sinks $10,000+ dollars into invasive medical procedures and subjects their body to a few months of stressful hormonal treatments must be getting pregnant on impulse.
I do not have a child, and I don't plan to have any, but this makes me so angry. I imagine those of you with children, especially if they were conceived using IVF, must be outraged.
Religion : Woman Sees Jesus In MRI - Pareidolia - And WXII Calls It News
You will no longer see new posts on this page. New posts will appear here
Jesus' face in an MRI? WXII, WYFF, how can you possibly call this news? How is it anything that a woman experienced Pareidolia? She's certainly not the first, and it means nothing. Not to mention that Jesus wouldn't have had long hair and that not everything that looks like a human face is a manifestation of Jesus (nor a manifestation of anything but an optical illusion). I'm very disappointed.
Granted, I don't even think Jesus existed much less that he was god, but this is just stupid.
He is, figuratively, the father of the technology that, literally, has allowed four million babies to be born over the past three decades.
This isn't a new or revolutionary point, but IVF involves allowing multiple eggs to be fertilized, creating several embryos, and only the most stable is used. The others are disposed of.
Those embryos that are not preserved in liquid nitrogen will inevitably die. They have no chance of living or developing into a newborn. Many clinics simply discard or destroy them. Some embryos are simply flushed down a sink drain while alive. Some are transferred to a medical waste bin where they are later incinerated, while alive. Some simply expose the embryos to the air and let them die naturally; this normally takes up to four days. Still other embryos are donated for research and experimentation, for personnel training, or for diagnostic purposes. At this stage in their development, they fortunately have no brain, no central nervous system, no pain sensors, no consciousness, no awareness of their environment. Thus, no matter by which method they are disposed, they will feel no discomfort.
Sound familiar? And yet, stem cell research is controversial. So is abortion, even when the embryo is just a few cells. Why is that? Perhaps because so many people have been helped by IVF that to politically attack it is dangerous?
UPDATE: I spoke too soon. There is at least one group stupid and insane enough to decry this helpful procedure, which has given us 4 million births that otherwise would have been denied to couples: The Vatican.
The Vatican is opposed to IVF because it involves separating conception from the "conjugal act" — sexual intercourse between a husband and wife — and often results in the destruction of embryos. Church teaching holds that human life begins at conception, and must be given the consequent respect and dignity from that moment on.
Keep it up, idiots. Don't you realize that's 4 million possible little Catholic kiddies for you to diddle and abuse with your nonsense?
Of course, as an atheist and therefore completely amoral degenerate, he began the book signing by killing and eating several children, then urinated on a stack of bibles, which instantly combusted under the heat of the sheer evil he emanates from his dark heart.
Actually, of course, he was completely charming and friendly. Unfortunately, the long line and limited time meant he couldn't personalize books or chat for more than a few seconds for each person during the signing, but I managed to get my copies of Greatest Show and Ancestor's Tale signed, of course with the traditional blood of a virgin sacrifice.
The lecture was about the main points of Greatest Show. He made quick work of providing the most famous evidence for evolution, including one of my all-time favorites, the laryngeal nerve. If you're unfamiliar,
The recurrent laryngeal nerve in humans begins in the brain then travels down into the the thorax, loops around the aorta, and travels back up the neck where it innervates the larynx...This isn't much of a problem in humans but in giraffes the recurrent laryngeal nerve has to travel several extra meters in order to get to its final destination. Those who advocate that evidence of design is evidence of God prefer to ignore examples such as these...This branch of the vagus nerve is present in fish were it is the fourth vagus nerve innervating one of the posterior gills. You can trace its evolution as the modern blood vessels evolved in the mammal lineage.
A Q&A session after his lecture was frustrating, mostly because the majority of the questions were variations on "how can I deal with/convince people in my life who are creationists?" Once was fine, but the several times a similar question was asked frustrated Dawkins and the audience. However, I was pleasantly surprised by the lack of stupid questions or creationist nonsense.
The only thing close was a Trinitarian lady who asked the last question of the day, which was more like a comment that Dawkins was too "polemical" and should work with religious groups to end human suffering rather than against them. Dawkins agreed that they might have some similar goals in ending the harm caused by religious fundamentalism and helping the poor and hungry and that their differences were primarily about what the reasons were for those goals and what each of them thought was true. He ended, congenially, with "but yes, let's be friends, definitely."
I was also glad to see that Banana Man himself, Ray Comfort, had some friends around distributing his free and distorted copies of Darwin's Origin Of Species. I thanked the gentleman who was distributing the books and told him that though the intro was obviously crap (it really is, really), another copy of the classic was always welcome on my shelf.
All in all, I had a great time, and I'm so glad I got to meet one of my biggest heroes and hear an enlightening lecture.
The National Weather Service's thermometer downtown reached 113 degrees for the first time since records began being kept in 1877 — and then stopped working. The record highs follow a summer of record lows.
Senate Republicans Unveil PIG Act | Crooks and Liars As promised, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) this week introduced legislation proposing to make the budget-busting 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts permanent. The so-called Tax Hike Prevention Act wouldn't merely drain $3.9 trillion from the U.S. Treasury over the next decade. At a time of record income inequality, the Republicans' $700 billion windfall for the wealthy would virtually ensure a perpetual income gap. Call it PIG for short.
RealClimate: Warmer and warmer Consistent with widespread media reports of extreme heat and adverse impacts in various places, the latest results from ERA-Interim indicate that the average temperature over land areas of the extratropical northern hemisphere reached a new high in July 2010. May and June 2010 were also unusually warm.
Religion : Obama Leaves Out "Creator" While Quoting Declaration
You will no longer see new posts on this page. New posts will appear here
Ah, the next ridiculous attack on the President is under way. This time, he's being accused of intentionlly leaving out religious verbiage while quoting the Declaration of Independence. Obviously the point his attackers are trying to drive home is that he's militantly secular, so much that he wants to remove their god from the government. Sigh. Would that that were true.
This is the bit he abridges:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, endowed with certain inalienable rights: life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Let me just make a few points:
1.) Obama is definitely a Christian. I'd love it if he was our first nonreligious President, but I can't bring myself to believe that.
2.) His quoting of the Declaration is quite abridged, that's for sure, but he leaves out a lot of other things besides the bit about the creator. He leaves out "that they are endowed by their Creator with," and "that among these are."
3.) Note, also, that he still uses the term "created," which to me indicates there was no anti-religious reason for this to be left out.
This was an innocent abridgment. Granted, it was not the smartest abridgment, but I see no reason to assume any anti-religious malice. I wish it had been, but it wasn't. American Thinker and others are trying to spin this hard, but it's a pretty lame attempt.
After President Obama says “created equal..”, there is a long pause during which he scowls and blinks several times. For once, he may actually have opted to not read something that was on the teleprompter. It looks like he is disgusted and decided it would be better not to read what the [Declaration] actually says.
Give me a break. He never looks anything like disgusted. Nice try, though. I'll be waiting for the email forwards to start in the next few days.
Religion : Pope, Catholics Demand Atheists Apologize For Hitler
You will no longer see new posts on this page. New posts will appear here
There is only one word for this. I don't usually curse here, but I think it's appropriate this time. This is straight up, no holds barred, ridiculous bullshit. Adolph Hitler was Catholic. He was by no means an atheist. He wasn't even a Unitarian or Deist or Non-Denominational Generic Christian. He was Catholic. That, however, didn't stop Pope Rat from comparing atheists to Nazis on his trip to England.
The Pope said:-
"Even in our own lifetime, we can recall how Britain and her leaders stood against a Nazi tyranny that wished to eradicate God from society and denied our common humanity to many, especially the Jews, who were thought unfit to live. I also recall the regime’s attitude to Christian pastors and religious who spoke the truth in love, opposed the Nazis and paid for that opposition with their lives. As we reflect on the sobering lessons of the atheist extremism of the twentieth century, let us never forget how the exclusion of God, religion and virtue from public life leads ultimately to a truncated vision of man and of society and thus to a “reductive vision of the person and his destiny” (Caritas in Veritate, 29)."
Richard Dawkins makes my points for me
Even if Hitler had been an atheist, his political philosophy was not based upon atheism and had no connection with atheism. Hitler was arguably (and by his own account) a Roman Catholic. In any case he enjoyed the open support of many of the most senior catholic clergy in Germany and the less demonstrative support of Pope Pius XII. Even if Hitler had been an atheist (he certainly was not), the rank and file Germans who carried out the attempted extermination of the Jews were Christians, almost to a man: either Catholic or Lutheran, primed to their anti-Semitism by centuries of Catholic propaganda about 'Christ-killers' and by Martin Luther's own seething hatred of the Jews. To mention Ratzinger's membership of the Hitler Youth might be thought to be fighting dirty, but my feeling is that the gloves are off after this disgraceful paragraph by the pope.
The pope did not go far enough. Radical atheists like the British Humanist Association should apologize for Hitler. But they should not stop there. They also need to issue an apology for the 67 million innocent men, women and children murdered under Stalin, and the 77 million innocent Chinese killed by Mao. Hitler, Stalin and Mao were all driven by a radical atheism, a militant and fundamentally dogmatic brand of secular extremism. It was this anti-religious impulse that allowed them to become mass murderers. By contrast, a grand total of 1,394 were killed during the 250 years of the Inquisition, most all of whom were murdered by secular authorities.
Well, that's lovely, isn't it? Stalin may have been an atheist; that's a bit fuzzy. He certainly had no love for organized religion, but he spoke as though he wasn't so much unconvinced of the existence of a god but angry at him and interested in dethroning him.
We do not fight against believers and not even clergymen. WE FIGHT AGAINST GOD to snatch believers from Him.
I wish to avenge myself against the One who rules above.
However, it doesn't appear that his thoughts about religion drove his actions, rather, he felt his actions would be easier to carry out if he abolished religion. Mao's religious beliefs are maybe even tougher to define, since he was ruling a country that had never been influenced by Judeo-Christian religions.
Either way, the religious traditions these dictators came from in no way explains their actions any more than Christianity can be blamed for Oklahoma City or The Crusades or Islam can be blamed for 9/11. It is disgusting that The Pope and his church would speak this way about a growing religious minority, especially with such historical revisionism.
Sorry, Pope Rat, but you're not going to distract us from your crimes by pointing and yelling "look, atheists!"
Culture Critique : Shameful Letter By Anti-Government-Assistance Doctor
You will no longer see new posts on this page. New posts will appear here
I saw this on Facebook (you may not be able to access that original link) and felt the need to respond:
Pictured is a young physician by the name of Dr. Roger Starner Jones. His short two-paragraph lett...er to the White House accurately puts the blame on a "Culture Crisis" instead of a "Health Care Crisis"..
It's worth a quick read:
Dear Mr. President:
During my shift in the Emergency Room last night, I had the pleasure of evaluating a patient whose smile revealed an expensive shiny gold tooth, whose body was adorned with a wide assortment of elaborate and costly tattoos, who wore a very expensive brand of tennis shoes and who chatted on a new cellular telephone equipped with a popular R&B ringtone.
While glancing over her patient chart, I happened to notice that her payer status was listed as "Medicaid"! During my examination of her, the patient informed me that she smokes more than one pack of cigarettes every day, eats only at fast-food take-outs, and somehow still has money to buy pretzels and beer. And, you and our Congress expect me to pay for this woman's health care? I contend that our nation's "health care crisis" is not the result of a shortage of quality hospitals, doctors or nurses. Rather, it is the result of a "crisis of culture" a culture in which it is perfectly acceptable to spend money on luxuries and vices while refusing to take care of one's self or, heaven forbid, purchase health insurance. It is a culture based in the irresponsible credo that "I can do whatever I want to because someone else will always take care of me". Once you fix this "culture crisis" that rewards irresponsibility and dependency, you'll be amazed at how quickly our nation's health care difficulties will disappear.
Respectfully,
ROGER STARNER JONES, MD
If you agree...pass it on.
There definitely IS a shortage of doctors, hospitals, and nurses, but that's not the main problem. The main problem is that regardless of this one, unverifiable, narcissistic story, people like this are outliers, not the main group of people getting their health care paid for. Most of them are hard-working people who cannot afford health care themselves.
The implication here is that everyone who does not have health insurance could afford to purchase it if they weren't blowing it all on drugs and tattoos. That's outrageous and obviously false.
This woman, if she exists, perhaps does not deserve all of the help she is given without giving something back and trying to help herself, but to imply that the only thing we need to do to fix our country's crises is just tell everyone to pay up is preposterous.
I posit that this Starner Jones is more what is wrong with America than the patient who he derided so terribly in this letter. Shame on him.
Life is really not that hard. Most of us reap what we sow.
What a dick. I mean, really? Life isn't hard? What universe is he living in? Maybe it's not hard if you're white, live in America, and grew up with food and shelter.
There are obviously people gaming the system. However, that in no way invalidates the program or implies that a majority are doing this. Specifically, there were 58,106,000 Medicaid recipients in 2007. There are surely more today.
How many of those do you think don't have health coverage because they're blowing their money on cigs and booze and tats, and how many do you think are normal people who don't have enough money?
Politics : High-Income People Would Benefit From Dem Tax Plan
You will no longer see new posts on this page. New posts will appear here
A fact generally overlooked in the debate over whether Congress should extend the high-income Bush tax cuts — i.e. those targeted exclusively at couples making over $250,000 and single individuals making over $200,000 — is that these households will still receive substantial tax cuts if Congress extends the so-called “middle-class” Bush tax cuts while letting the high-income tax cuts expire as scheduled.
This is because the 2001 tax law’s reductions in the lower tax brackets benefit not only people whose incomes fall within the lower brackets but also those whose incomes exceed those brackets. In fact, high-income people actually receive much larger benefits in dollar terms from the so-called “middle-class tax cuts” than middle-class people do.[1]
Specifically, recent estimates from the Joint Committee on Taxation show that extending just the middle-class tax cuts would provide more than $6,300 in tax cuts to households with incomes above $200,000, on average, compared to $1,132 in tax cuts for households with incomes between $50,000 and $75,000. The Joint Tax Committee estimates show:
* Households with incomes exceeding $1 million will receive an average tax cut of $6,349 in 2011 if the middle-class tax cuts are extended while the high-income tax cuts are allowed to expire. (They will receive an average tax cut of nearly $104,000 if the high-income tax cuts are extended as well.)
* The story is similar, if not quite as dramatic, for households that make between $500,000 and $1 million. They will receive an average tax cut of $6,701 if the middle-class tax cuts are excluded (and of $17,467 if the high-income tax cuts are also extended).
* For all other income categories, by contrast, the size of the tax cuts are about the same whether the high-income tax cuts are extended or not. Even for households with incomes between $200,000 and $500,000, the effects are similar. The Joint Tax Committee figures show that they would receive an average tax cut of $6,743 if only the middle-class tax cuts are extended, and of $7,152 if the high-income tax cuts are extended, as well.
Are the heat waves really getting more extreme? This question popped up after the summer of 2003 in Europe, and yet again after this hot Russian summer. The European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), which normally doesn’t make much noise about climate issues, has since made a statement about July global mean temperature being record warm:
Consistent with widespread media reports of extreme heat and adverse impacts in various places, the latest results from ERA-Interim indicate that the average temperature over land areas of the extratropical northern hemisphere reached a new high in July 2010. May and June 2010 were also unusually warm.
Friendly Atheist - Dr. Atheist Wants to Kill You Faster, Says Guardian Article doctors who described themselves as non-religious were more likely than others to report having given continuous deep sedation until death, having taken decisions they expected or partly intended to end life, and to have discussed these decisions with patients judged to have the capacity to participate in discussions.
Daily Kos - The Republicans do have an agenda As noted by Jed Lewison, the Republican agenda, should they retake the House, distills down to this: Extend Bush tax cuts for wealthy.
RealClimate - Doing it yourselves We've been a little preoccupied recently, but there are some recent developments in the field of do-it-yourself climate science that are worth noting.
Bad Astronomy - SPEECH Act now a law: big win for libel reform! American authors, journalists, and bloggers can breathe a sigh of relief: with broad bipartisan support, a short time ago President Obama signed a bill into law that makes sure that the awful and regressive libel laws in the UK cannot be enforced here in the United States.
Friendly Atheist - Dr. Atheist Wants to Kill You Faster, Says Guardian Article … doctors who described themselves as non-religious were more likely than others to report having given continuous deep sedation until death, having taken decisions they expected or partly intended to end life, and to have discussed these decisions with patients judged to have the capacity to participate in discussions.
Culture Critique : Defending Ishmael and Daniel Quinn After James Lee Story
You will no longer see new posts on this page. New posts will appear here
Today, in an unfortunate series of events, James J. Lee took hostages at the Discovery Communications building in Silver Spring, MD. This is obviously a big deal (by the way, he has now been shot, and all hostages are safe), but it's an even bigger deal to me for a couple of reasons. One is because it's yet another instance of an obviously unstable person misunderstanding the ideas in a book and bringing them to an incorrect and violent conclusion.
Wednesday, as police tried to get the situation under control, details of Lee were emerging. His MySpace page shows a 43-year-old who wanted to meet "environmentalists, scientists, readers of Daniel Quinn, and people who want to work toward a real change."
If you've followed me for a while, you may have seen me mention Quinn and Ishmael. His books were an inspiration for me, however, not in the same way they were an inspiration for Lee. Violence was certainly never advocated by Quinn, in fact, quite the opposite. However, Lee's misunderstanding goes much further than that. Daniel Quinn's website is here.
In his Manifesto, Lee makes it clear that he misunderstood Quinn's message completely:
Civilization must be exposed for the filth it is. That, and all its disgusting religious-cultural
roots and greed. Broadcast this message until the pollution in the planet is reversed and the
human population goes down! This is your obligation. If you think it isn't, then get hell off the
planet! Breathe Oil! It is the moral obligation of everyone living otherwise what good are they??
Also, many are calling this a "left-wing" attack, though his words seem to indicate more of a crazy mishmash of right-wing, left-wing, environmentalist, and anarchist beliefs. He does mention Daniel Quinn and Al Gore as inspirations, but he also says
Immigration: Programs must be developed to find solutions to stopping ALL immigration
pollution and the anchor baby filth that follows that. Find solutions to stopping it. Call for people
in the world to develop solutions to stop it completely and permanently. Find solutions FOR
these countries so they stop sending their breeding populations to the US and the world to seek
jobs and therefore breed more unwanted pollution babies. FIND SOLUTIONS FOR THEM TO
STOP THEIR HUMAN GROWTH AND THE EXPORTATION OF THAT DISGUSTING FILTH!
(The first world is feeding the population growth of the Third World and those human families
are going to where the food is! They must stop procreating new humans looking for nonexistant
jobs!)
A Fox News viewer, apparently, among other things. To be clear, Daniel Quinn's books do indicate that our civilization is dangerous and headed to collapse. He does indicate that population-curbing programs would be a good idea. However, he does not imply that these changes should be made with eugenics and violence. He advocates groups of people coming to common-sense solutions through education. He does not ever say that humans are evil or dirty or a problem. In fact, he makes it very clear that the problem isn't humanity but the way humanity started living after the agricultural revolution. Some quotes from Ishmael:
"First, some vocabulary. Let's have some names so we don't have to go on talking about 'the people of your culture' and 'the people of all other cultures.' I've used various names with various pupils, but I'm going to try a new pair with you. You're familiar with the expression 'Take it or leave it.' Using them in this sense, do the words takers and leavers have any heavy connotation for you?"
"I'm not sure what you mean."
"I mean, if I call one group Takers and the other group Leavers, will this sound like I'm setting up one to be good guys and the other to be bad guys?"
"No. They sound pretty neutral to me."
"Good. So henceforth I'm going to call the people of your culture Takers and the people of all other cultures Leavers."
The premise of the Taker story is the world belongs to man...The premise of the Leaver story is man belongs to the world.
You can't change these things with laws. You must change people's minds.
“The story the Leavers have been enacting for the past three million years isn’t a story of conquest and rule. Enacting it doesn’t give them power. Enacting it gives them lives that are satisfying and meaningful to them. This is what you’ll find if you go among them. They’re not seething with discontent and rebellion, not incessantly wrangling over what should be allowed and what forbidden, not forever accusing each other of not living the right way, not living in terror of each other not going crazy because their lives seem empty and pointless, not having to stupefy themselves with drugs to get through the days, not having a new religion every week to give them something to hold on to, not forever searching for something to do or something to believe in that will make lives worth living. And – I repeat – this is not because they live close to nature or have no formal government or because they’re innately noble. This is simply because they’re enacting a story that works well for people – a story that worked well for three million years and that still works well where the Takers haven’t yet managed to stamp it out.”
Ishmael thought for a moment, "Among the people of your culture, which want to destroy the world?"
"Which want to destroy it? As far as I know, no one specifically wants to destroy the world."
"And yet you do destroy it, each of you. Each of you contributes daily to the destruction of the world."
"Yes, that's so."
"Why don't you stop?"
I shrugged, "Frankly, we don't know how."
"You're captives of a civilizational system that more or less compels you to go on destroying the world in order to live."
"Yes, that's the way it seems."
Quinn, for his part, clearly disavows this behavior:
When reached in Houston on Wednesday afternoon, Quinn told TBD that he had never heard of Lee, and his wife could not recall any type of correspondence from him.
"Good God," Quinn said. "Well, I'm certainly surprised and distressed that he had somehow or other taken my book as a model for this kind of behavior."
When asked what he would tell Lee if he could talk to him, Quinn said: "I guess I would ask him what he thinks he's doing and what he thinks he's accomplishing and then go from there. What's in his mind is what's paramount right now. Sort of wish I could talk to him."
The way it looks to me is not necessarily that he was inspired to violence by the books but inspired to change the world by the books... then decided (if you can call what someone this unstable does) that taking hostages would reach that end. Clearly he is confused and dangerous, and his story ended sadly today.
Culture Critique : To Be Or Not To Be... A Dick... That Is The Question
You will no longer see new posts on this page. New posts will appear here
There's a really interesting debate going on right now in the skeptic/atheist community about the effectiveness of ridicule versus being... soft and nice, and it's involving the likes of Phil Plait (The Bad Astronomer), Dawkins, Jerry Coyne, and PZ Myers. It's a really good debate, and I think all sides have some valid comments. I tend to side most with the Dawkins/Coyne edge of the discussion for the most part, and I think they explain their positions well. You guys should all check this discussion out, because I think it's an important one.
As you may know, Plait’s theme was one of civility. He argues that skeptics and atheists must be respectful and civil if they want to win others to their cause. But he finds that politeness on the wane. “In some specific places,” he claims, “the tone of what we’re doing is decaying, and instead of relying on the merits of the arguments, which is what critical thinking is really all about, what evidence based reasoning is all about— it seems that vitriol and venom are on the rise.”
He links to Plait's talk that started this whole discussion, which he gave at The Amazing Meeting.
When you’re dealing with someone who disagrees with you on some matter, what is your goal? What is your goal? What are you trying to accomplish? Insulting them, yelling at them, calling them brain damaged or morons or baby rapers, may make you feel good. . . but is your goal to score a cheap point, or is your goal to win the damn game?
One of Coyne's complaints is very important:
What struck me most strongly about the DBAD talk, and reminded me of the Tom Johnson affair, was Plait’s complete failure to provide evidence for what he was saying. Not only did he not give a single instance of the rudeness and stridency that he finds so ubiquitous, but also gave no evidence that skeptics who behave that way have been less effective than others. This was curious because, after all, the prime requirement for good skepticism is that you give evidence for what you think, and demand it from others.
First, Plait’s opening question was ludicrously loaded, biased to produce the answer that would gladden his accommodationist heart. “How many of you changed your mind because a skeptic screamed in your face . . . and called you an idiot and a retard?” Well, obviously, if you put it like that there is only one possible answer. But suppose he had said, “How many of you changed your mind because you saw your beliefs being devastatingly mocked, ridiculed, surgically taken apart with razor-sharp wit . . . ?”
He continues to what I think is the most important bit:
Similarly, when I employ ridicule against the arguments of a young earth creationist, I am almost never trying to convert the YEC himself. That is probably a waste of time. I am trying to influence all the third parties listening in, or reading my books. I am amazed at Plait’s naivety in overlooking that and treating it as obvious that our goal is to convert the target of our ridicule. Ridicule may indeed annoy the target and cause him to dig his toes in. But our goal might very well be (in my case usually is) to influence third parties, sitting on the fence, or just not very well-informed about the issues. And to achieve that goal, ridicule can be very effective indeed.
PZ doesn't cover it a lot, and his example isn't very good I don't think, but I still think he's basically right, and obviously he has no problem with being a dick.... which is part of his charm. Anyway, I thought it was cool these guys were having this debate, because they're some people I really look up to in a lot of ways, and it's great to see them debating like this.
Personally, I find that it depends on the situation. I totally agree with Dawkins that you're not going to convince a creationist with science, and of course Plait actually makes a similar point in his talk. However, you might convince the people who are listening to or reading the debate you're having with that creationist, and that is where the change can set in. I like to be polite but firm in most cases and typically don't do anything rude until (and unfortunately this happens often) the person I'm talking to becomes indignant. Plait's heart was in the right place, I think, but he does seem to have set up a straw man, at least a sort-of straw man.
Government agents can sneak onto your property in the middle of the night, put a GPS device on the bottom of your car and keep track of everywhere you go. This doesn't violate your Fourth Amendment rights, because you do not have any reasonable expectation of privacy in your own driveway — and no reasonable expectation that the government isn't tracking your movements.
...
This case began in 2007, when Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agents decided to monitor Juan Pineda-Moreno, an Oregon resident who they suspected was growing marijuana. They snuck onto his property in the middle of the night and found his Jeep in his driveway, a few feet from his trailer home. Then they attached a GPS tracking device to the vehicle's underside.
Instead, they're rallying to repeal a healthcare bill, thereby increasing the deficit by $455 Billion. In other words, the tea party is a sham... but you knew that.
Speaking of the tea party, I was having a discussion with some people yesterday about them. The discussion was primarily over how actually "grassroots" these groups are and to what extent they're actually organized and funded by lobbying groups, conservative-leaning corporations, Fox News, etc. I've documented my experience with a local tea party
The least surprising but most disappointing thing about the tea party rally I attended yesterday on the campus of Wake Forest University was that it was hosted by the campus GOP. I keep hearing that the tea partiers are "independent" and not connected to any particular political party, so it was interesting that for the 1.5 hours I was there, the speakers (who did not stop speaking to allow "the people" to talk) were all either campus GOP, local GOP, or endorsing GOP candidates. It was sponsored by Civitas, an NC limited government (read: republican) organization and the John Locke Foundation. In other words, like all other tea party rallies, there is no grassroots organization here. It's all top-down, run by conservative groups with a lot of money. "Community organizers," if you will.
It seems to me that this indicates a change in the tea party movement. The GOP is either scared that the tea party might break off and somehow take down the official party, or they're trying to reign these people in because they make republicans look bad. Either way, it was clear at this rally that even in a smaller city like Winston-Salem, the upper-levels of the republican party have decided to take an active hand in corralling these things. Literally. There was a yellow rope around the entire proceedings.
It seems that this is the case on a national scale, but I don't think the GOP is "taking over" the tea parties; I think they've always been organized by the mainstream party in order to rally a conservative base. Their funding sources leave little evidence to the contrary
Reports indicate that the Tea Party Movement benefits from millions of dollars from conservative foundations that are derived from wealthy U.S. families and their business interests. Is appears that money to organize and implement the Movement is flowing primarily through two conservative groups: Americans for Prosperity and FreedomWorks.
In an April 9, 2009 article on ThinkProgress.org, Lee Fang reports that the principal organizers of Tea Party events are Americans for Prosperity and Freedom Works, two "lobbyist-run think tanks" that are "well funded" and that provide the logistics and organizing for the Tea Party movement from coast to coast. Media Matters reported that David Koch of Koch Industries was a co-founder of Citizens for a Sound Economy (CSE), the predecessor of FreedomWorks. David Koch was chairman of the board of directors of CSE. CSE received substantial funding from David Koch of Koch Industries, which is the largest privately-held energy company in the country, and the conservative Koch Family Foundations, which make substantial annual donations to conservative think tanks, advocacy groups, etc. Media Matters reported that the Koch family has given more than $12 million to CSE (predecessor of FreedomWorks) between 1985 and 2002
Those attending these rallies think they're taking part in a grassroots uprising, an independent and simultaneous groundswell of angry, working-class citizens. Unfortunately for them, they're actually just being hoodwinked into working for stock Republican causes. Sure, the tea party backed candidates that have won a few primaries do exist, but once they're elected as Republicans (assuming they're even electable, and that remains to be seen), they'll have to fall into line. They'll constitute too small a minority to make any real headway in moving the party to the more crazy than usual side they represent.
My prediction is that the moment Republicans win a congressional majority (still a very real possibility for November 2010, though not definite), the tea party will quickly fade into obscurity. They may be kept semi-organized as a right-leaning version of Obama's Organizing For America group, used to knock on doors and attend local political talks, but they're hardly going to be a real offshoot or separate party. I think the Republicans know better than to let that happen.
Scenes From A Multiverse - Pony Tales This is why imaginations need to be made illegal! People take their stories way too seriously sometimes, stories are meant to be soothing to infants and the mentally diff-abled and not to be taken internally by responsible adults or used as the basis for legislation or warfare or anything nasty.
Pharyngula - I get email Greg Abell wrote to me, requesting answers to his questions, which he doesn't ask, and since he caught me in a cranky moment, I felt like answering.
Bad Astronomy - Mesmerizing Perseid timelapse video I missed the Perseids last week combination of bad weather and having to get up early to go to SETIcon the next day but I, and now you, can get a good feel for them via this lovely timelapse video taken by photographer Henry Jun Wah Lee:
Joshua Tree Under the Milky Way from Henry Jun Wah Lee.
Slow Food : Stop this Bad Egg from endangering people again
You will no longer see new posts on this page. New posts will appear here
Look behind the curtain on the controversy and you'll find habitual violator Jack DeCoster, whose rap sheet of violations of state and federal laws regarding food safety, human rights, labor rights, the environment and animal cruelty is a mile long.
The voluntary recall was announced by Hillandale Farms. The company is located about 100 miles from the Wright County Eggs, based in Galt, Iowa, which has previously ordered a recall of 380 million eggs in one of the largest egg recalls in history.
"There have been laboratory-confirmed salmonella enteritidis illnesses associated with the shell eggs," Hillandale Farms noted in a press release. "[T]he investigation is ongoing."
Daily Kos - ABA backs marriage equality How convincing was Judge Vaughn Walker's decision to strike down Prop 8? Strong enough to lead the American Bar Association to back marriage equality.
Gawker - E=mc2 Is a Liberal Conspiracy [Conspiracy Theories] To many conservatives, almost everything is a secret liberal plot: from fluoride in the water to medicare reimbursements for end-of-life planning with your doctor to efforts to teach evolution in schools.
After the Dems dispensed with and inane Republican effort to get two months paid vacation at the end of the year, and approved $600 million for a border "security" bill that does nothing to address comprehensive immigration reform in any way, and which the Republicans will continue to bitch about anyway, they got down to the actual business of the day: passing the $26.1 billion to help keep the states afloat for the remainder of the year.
With the time running out, the vote count stood at 247-161.
My wife is a teacher in North Carolina, and we both appreciate this. Please keep it up.
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) -- A bill that would send $640 million to North Carolina state government and local schools schools has been signed into law by President Obama.
The U.S. House approved Tuesday a $26 billion bill pushed by Democrats that mostly would pay for extra Medicaid expenses and school districts to preserve teacher positions. Obama signed it later in the day.
State officials say North Carolina's $343 million Medicaid share means state government won't have to take an extra 1 percent cut and withhold pension contributions to narrow a budget gap.
The Department of Public Instruction says nearly $300 million in grants equal about 4,800 teaching positions. Bill McNeal with the North Carolina Association of School Administrators says local districts will be pleased to receive additional money after cutting expenses before the new school yea
Over the past day, Twitter has been abuzz with tweets¹ on the Conservapedia page on “Counterexamples to relativity“, provides a list of 24 “points” that attempt to show the weakness of Einstein’s crazy ideas!
In my mind, perhaps the most despicable sort of denialism or crankery, however, is that which is based on some sort of political or religious ideology. This is clearly what is going on here, and the author relies on a familiar form of rhetorical trickery known as the “Gish Gallop“: throw as many claims out there as possible, regardless of their validity, with the realization that most people will be swayed by the amount of “evidence”, and not look too closely at the details.
Looking at the “evidence”, it is clear that there isn’t a single point made that isn’t misleading, incoherent, or simply dishonest. A person reading the Conservapedia post will be measurably more ignorant afterwards, and I get the distinct impression that this is what the author intended.
This is all very entertaining (and frightening), but I think this is the most important point:
Einstein’s theory of relativity built upon Newton’s earlier theory of relativity — Newton’s theory was not shown to be wrong, but rather incomplete. Assuming that a new piece of evidence somehow invalidates a century of observations shows a complete lack of understanding of science and how it works.
No, of course they don't understand science. If they did, they wouldn't be idiotically attempting to ignore evolution, climate change, and other important (and clearly proven) scientific facts.
For instance, the Tea Party, the grassroots movement committed to reining in what they perceive as big government, and fiscal irresponsibility, also appear predisposed to intolerance. Approximately 45% of Whites either strongly or somewhat approve of the movement. Of those, only 35% believe Blacks to be hardworking, only 45 % believe Blacks are intelligent, and only 41% think that Blacks are trustworthy. Perceptions of Latinos aren’t much different. While 54% of White Tea Party supporters believe Latinos to be hardworking, only 44% think them intelligent, and even fewer, 42% of Tea Party supporters believe Latinos to be trustworthy. When it comes to gays and lesbians, White Tea Party supporters also hold negative attitudes. Only 36% think gay and lesbian couples should be allowed to adopt children, and just 17% are in favor of same-sex marriage.
Don't worry, though - The Tea Party is still going to be prevalent on the news and represented as a "grassroots," populist organization.
Politics : Texaria Law - The Republican GOP Platform Is Scary
You will no longer see new posts on this page. New posts will appear here
Religious conservatives, regardless of which religion they are members of, seem to be all the same to me:
We oppose the legalization of sodomy. We demand that Congress exercise its authority granted by the U.S. Constitution to withhold jurisdiction from the federal courts from cases involving sodomy.
Interesting. So none of these guys enjoy oral sex, then? Or are they jealous because they can't get it?
We also urge the Texas Legislature and the United States Congress to enact legislation prohibiting any jurisdiction from allowing any substitute or parallel system of Law, specifically, but not limited to, Sharia Law, to be recognized which is not in accordance with the Constitutions of Texas or of the United States of America.
It's interesting, because while the platform specifically rails against Sharia Law, it seems to me that it also advocates for just that, but with a Judeo-Christian slant. Ironical, ain't it? The full platform is here, if you dare...
General : Earth Is Warming, Prop 8 Overturned, GOP Loves Deficits, Birthers
You will no longer see new posts on this page. New posts will appear here
Here are my most recent links:
Bad Astronomy - New study clinches it: the Earth is warming up The 2009 State of the Climate report released today draws on data for 10 key climate indicators that all point to the same finding: the scientific evidence that our world is warming is unmistakable.
Daily Kos: Prop 8 Struck Down: The Decision Findings of Fact: Start by remembering that Judge Walker conducted a trial -- this was not merely decided based on legal arguments, but on lay and expert testimony regarding the impact of Prop 8 on real couples, same-sex and opposite-sex. As the trial judge, Judge Walker's determinations as to the reliability of these witnesses will receive a great deal of deference by the appellate courts which will review this decision, and on that, his conclusions are devastating to Prop 8
Wonk Room - Oil Spill Could Put Gulf Sturgeon On Brink Of Extinction Impacts on Gulf sturgeon associated with routine operations and accidental spills under the proposed action are expected to be minimal, because there is relatively little overlap between the locations that could be affected by activities and the distribution of Gulf sturgeon.
The Itch of Curiosity | Wired Science | Wired.com Curiosity is one of those personality traits that gets short scientific shrift. It strikes me as a really important mental habit - how many successful people are utterly incurious? but it's also extremely imprecise.
Talking Points Memo - McConnell Makes His Choice There was a very important development this afternoon which Sam Stein of the Huffington Post managed to get the jump on: Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has come out in support of congressional hearings into the matter of whether the US Constitution grants citizenship to every person born in the United States -- so-called 'birthright' citizenship.
As scientists would predict in a hotter world, some of the indicators—such as ocean heat content and temperature over land—are increasing. Others, such as sea ice cover and snow cover, are decreasing.
The influx of greenhouses gases into the atmosphere has also hit oceans particularly hard, the NOAA report says. (See an interactive on the greenhouse effect and global warming.)
New evidence suggests that more than 90 percent of that heat trapped by greenhouses gases over the past 50 years has been absorbed into the oceans.
Because water expands as it warms, the added ocean heat is contributing to sea level rise as well as to the rapid melting of Arctic summer sea ice. That melting in 2010 is on track to be worse than 2007, when Arctic ice cover reached its lowest point on record.
Such climatic shifts are already ushering in extreme weather, which plagued much of the globe in 2009, according to the report. (See a world map of potential global warming impacts.) For instance, Australia experienced its third hottest year on record.
On one February 2009 day—labeled "Black Saturday"—in Australia, 400 wildfires swept across the state of Victoria, killing 173 people and destroying 3,500 buildings. (See pictures of the Australian fires.)
Overall, I'd never suggest posting information on a website that you don't want anyone and everyone to be able to see, regardless of what kind of promises you get. Even if Facebook's privacy was perfect, someone could still hack your account or look over your or a friend's shoulder in a public place, or someone could hack your friends' accounts and see your info that way. I guess what I'm wondering is this: how much privacy is it reasonable to expect on a site like Facebook?
I feel this is pretty logical, but now the big story is about a woman who was freaked out when the information she publicly posted on Foursquare was used to... shock... find her:
"I saw that you checked in there on Foursquare," said the stranger calling the restaurant where Shea Sylvia was dining. He suggested they "hang out," adding, "You probably shouldn't be telling people where you are on Foursquare, should you?"
Sylvia lives in Kansas City and works in online marketing. Her story, first chronicled on her personal blog and reprinted in The Guardian, is creepy on unending levels. There is the fact that he chose to call the restaurant and ask the manager to find her, based on a description culled from her profile photo. There is the threatening, teach-you-a-lesson tone, shortly after she declined to be overjoyed at his advances. And somehow, the simple act of jumping platforms — hasn't he ever heard of tweeting at someone? — into the physical space, at an unguarded moment, is creepiest of all.
The way I see it, while the person doing it was obviously creepy, how is it much creeper in and of itself than someone walking up to you in a restaurant? How is it different from someone looking you up in the phone book (remember those?) and calling your house, saying "you probably shouldn't be telling people your phone number, should you?" Sure, they know your name now and can check out your public info, but you knew that going in. The only thing creepy about it is that the person is being all holier than thou, not to mention weird, because he "found you" in the real world.
This sort of thing doesn't really phase me. I mean, if you're going to put your location on the internet, you don't realize that means people can... see it? Instead of "when Facebook gets creepy" it should be called "when people don't think about the consequences of their actions."
Sites like Please Rob Me imply that by posting your location, you're letting people know you're away from home and are therefore a robbery target. Really? I suppose you aren't gone for 8-10 hours per day at work, every day, so that someone can rob you then? Has that happened? How is this different?
Again, this doesn't make any real sense. If you're going to rob someone because they're checked into some place on Foursquare, what would you have to do? Assuming you're not a friend who already knows the person's schedule, address, etc...
1.) Find someone who is checked into some place who is not your friend (or who you don't mind robbing)
2.) Find out his or her address, using some connection between foursquare / twitter / Facebook accounts and Google.
3.) Figure out how long they'll be there
4.) Figure out how far away it is from the house
5.) Figure out if the house is, indeed, empty (often more than 1 person lives in a house, you see)
5.) Get to the house and case it, make sure there's no alarm, make sure there are no neighbors who will notice
6.) Rob the house
Or, you could just drive around looking for empty houses that already look easy to rob. Think about it - what makes the most sense? This is silly, just like people freaking out about their license plates or their windows being visible on Google Maps. They're visible in the real world, and there are photos all over the internet with houses and license plates in them, so why all of a sudden is it creepy for them to be on Google Maps? I suppose the fact that they're all now indexed and searchable by a large corporation makes it a bit less innocuous, but not by much.
It seems to me people should just be logical, be smart, and use the internet wisely. Don't post information, behind supposed privacy protection or not, that you don't want to risk someone seeing.
This web site serves as an introduction and portal to four faithful ministries which are teaching that WE CAN KNOW from the Bible alone that the date of the rapture of believers will take place on May 21, 2011 and that God will destroy this world on October 21, 2011. Please take your time and browse through the teachings of Harold Camping, President of Family Radio. Visit EBible Fellowship, Bible Ministries International, and The-Latter-Rain to read and listen to many faithful teachers give scriptural insight on the doctrines that God is teaching His people. Learn about the Biblical Timeline of History, the correct method of Bible interpretation, the End of the Church Age and God's command to believers that they must depart out of the churches. Study the proofs that God has so graciously given in His Word showing us that these dates are 100% accurate and beyond dispute. Above all, please READ THE BIBLE and prayerfully ask God to open your spiritual eyes to these truths. May it please Him to have mercy on each of our souls.
Do you figure they'll give me all their money on May 20, then? Obviously they won't need it...
Because the woman he was supposed to drive wanted to go to Planned Parenthood. And Mr. Graning believed that she was going to get an abortion. It didn't matter to Mr. Graning that she might have been going for a pap test or breast exam, that it was, in fact, unlikely that she was seeking an abortion because despite the constant smears from the forced birth movement, abortion is only 3 percent of the services Planned Parenthood provides.
I'm thinking no. And for two reasons: The odds of there being intelligent aliens somewhere in the galaxy, space-faring aliens, are incredibly low, and even if they do exist they'd be so far away that getting here would be a serious problem. Enough that the trip wouldn't be worth it.
TPMDC - Boehner's Recipe For Creating Jobs: Do Nothing In a meeting with several reporters this afternoon, House Minority Leader John Boehner outlined the top three measures he'd pursue if he becomes Speaker of the House next Congress to create new jobs.
Politics : Republicans Block Campaign Disclosure Bill
You will no longer see new posts on this page. New posts will appear here
Assistant Senate Democratic Leader Dick Durbin pointedly noted that many Republicans had earlier favored more disclosure.
But this year, Durbin said, "They're betting that most of these ads are going to be on behalf of their candidates and against Democrats. That's what it comes down to."
Yep. It will come up for another cloture vote soon, with Lieberman behind it, but 1 sane Republican will be needed.
Are there aliens out there who might kidnap humans and put them through all manner of nefarious exercises?
I'm thinking no. And for two reasons: The odds of there being intelligent aliens somewhere in the galaxy, space-faring aliens, are incredibly low, and even if they do exist they'd be so far away that getting here would be a serious problem. Enough that the trip wouldn't be worth it.
...
When we finally travel to other stars and find Earth-like planets, the chances are pretty good that most of them will have simple life on them. No dinosaur-filled jungles, no proto-Vulcans, nothing like that whatever. It'll be a rare planet indeed that even has something resembling animals, and rarer one yet with anything near our technological level.
Now, you might suppose there's a planet orbiting some star that's older than Earth. After all, the galaxy has been around for 10 to 12 billion years! Maybe an Earth-like planet formed a million years before ours did, fostering an alien civilization that's now in advance of where we are.
I'm just tooting my own horn, and Phil does a far better job of explaining this than I ever could, but it feels good to know such an awesome astronomer (and fellow Doctor Who fan!) agrees with me on this.
Last month was the hottest June ever recorded worldwide and the fourth consecutive month that the combined global land and sea temperature records have been broken, according to the US government's climate data centre.
The figures released last night by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) suggest that 2010 is now on course to be the warmest year since records began in 1880.