General : DADT Repeal, Fox Edits Applause From Obama Speech, Oil Regulation Fail
Here are my most recent links:
Daily Kos - DADT: White House signs off on repeal compromise But now, it looks like the Obama Administration has seen on the wall the handwriting created by pressure both from activists and from a House leadership team that seems more interested in doing what is right than what is politically expedient--and now a deal is in the works.
voices.washingtonpost.com - Ezra Klein - The big offshore lie The Obama administration, in the wake of the Gulf of Mexico disaster, has apparently decided that digging in on its misguided decision in March to expand offshore drilling is the way to go.
www.nytimes.com - Inspector General Faults Minerals Management Service - NYTimes.com Federal regulators responsible for oversight of drilling in the Gulf of Mexico allowed industry officials several years ago to fill in their own inspection reports in pencil - and then turned them over to the regulators, who traced over them in pen before submitting the reports to the agency, according to an inspector generals report to be released this week.
Daily Kos - NC-08: Republican Party attacks Tea Party candidate Apparently afraid that they'll be forced to publicly support another Rand Paul-like candidate, the Republican Party is now openly attacking a tea party candidate in North Carolina: Republican officials are working to derail the campaign of a tea party supported candidate in North Carolina - circulating documents from the man's messy divorce that depict him as a pot smoker who has called himself the messiah.
Mashable! - Towel Day Celebrations Hit YouTube and Flickr Happy Towel Day!This universal holiday, which honors the life and work of Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy author Douglas Adams, is being celebrated by his fans the world over today.
Pharyngula - No better demonstration of the futility of prayer Angela Wright had a serious heart attack two months ago; she seems to have had a history of cardiovascular problems, because she'd also had a series of blood clots in her leg that required a partial amputation about 20 years ago.
Science : Fox News "Science" Stories Are Hilarious!
The hottest new trend in climate change may be global cooling, some researchers say.
Contrary to the commonly held scientific conclusion that the Earth is getting warmer, Dr. Don Easterbrook, emeritus professor of geology at Western Washington University and author of more than 150 peer-reviewed papers, has unveiled evidence for his prediction that global cooling is coming soon.
Immediate evidence you're dealing with a liar or,at best, an idiot:
"A sign of global cooling? This past “decade set a record for largest average global snow extent,” Taylor said."
Snow does not indicate cooling.That's ridiculous. It indicates only that the area where it snowed was around or below 32 F. Cute of Fox to find a "scientist" to push Sean Hannity's nonsense, though. The funny doesn't just lie in that last line, though:
Easterbrook spoke before a group of about 700 scientists and government officials at the fourth International Conference on Climate Change. The conference is presented annually in Chicago by the Heartland Institute, a conservative nonprofit think tank that actively questions the theory of man's role in global warming. Last year the Institute published Climate Change Reconsidered, a comprehensive reply to the United Nations' latest report on climate change.
His study, which has not been peer reviewed, is illustrated with photographs of weather stations in locations where their readings are distorted by heat-generating equipment."
"Has not been peer reviewed."
Mark my words, if he gets it reviewed, he'll be laughed at. If it's reviewed and fails, that of course won't be reported by Fox.
Does anyone find it interesting that we hear from Fox etc "global warming's not real! It snowed, so it's not real! Ha! Stupid scientists!" Then this guy and his buddies, whose research hasn't even been reviewed, gets a huge writeup in Fox? Give me a break.
More on Christy and Spencer, the climate change denialists this story is about, whose research has already been debunked:
We now know, of course, that the satellite data set confirms that the climate is warming , and indeed at very nearly the same rate as indicated by the surface temperature records. Now, there's nothing wrong with making mistakes when pursuing an innovative observational method, but Spencer and Christy sat by for most of a decade allowing - indeed encouraging - the use of their data set as an icon for global warming skeptics. They committed serial errors in the data analysis, but insisted they were right and models and thermometers were wrong. They did little or nothing to root out possible sources of errors, and left it to others to clean up the mess, as has now been done.
Politics : Bill O'Reilly and John Stewart - The Missing Tapes
This is fascinating - the Stewart / O'Reilly clips that Fox cut from the broadcast but graciously left on the full, uncut interview on their website. Stewart really has this whole thing down, and he describes it all SO WELL, and his theory about the Fox narrative is just so on point that I wonder if he's not being wasted at Comedy Central at this point.
Here's one example. I feel dirty linking to Fox, but here's the full interview, and it's really worth the time.
The group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals wants the flyswatter in chief to try taking a more humane attitude the next time he's bedeviled by a fly in the White House.
PETA is sending President Barack Obama a Katcha Bug Humane Bug Catcher, a device that allows users to trap a house fly and then release it outside.
"We support compassion even for the most curious, smallest and least sympathetic animals," PETA spokesman Bruce Friedrich said Wednesday. "We believe that people, where they can be compassionate, should be, for all animals."
Not that they're necessarily wrong that flies are living creatures who deserve respect, I guess... It's just... wow. I totally called it. As for the Republican response, well, that was less surprising when I got it right. I think that one was more obvious, partially because they kind of have a point. Malkin:
President Obama killed a fly! President Obama killed a fly! "The poise! The cupping!" Swoon. Drool. Faint:
But as Liz Cox Barrett at the Columbia Journalism Review points out, with all of the glee over a dead insect, media outlets, including the one that actually conducted the interview, haven't bothered to report on what the President had to say. So in case you were interested, besides displaying his "Jedi moves," Obama also discussed regulatory reform proposals, health care, Iran, and he slammed Fox News:
Pres. OBAMA: First of all, I've got one television station entirely devoted to attacking my administration. I mean, you know, that's a pretty...
HARWOOD: I assume you're talking about Fox.
Pres. OBAMA: Well, that's a pretty big megaphone. And you'd be hard-pressed, if you watched the entire day, to find a positive story about me on that front.
Culture Critique : On The Murder of Dr. Tiller and Home-Grown Christian Jihadists
I am not a fan of abortion. I do believe in a woman's right to choose, and I do think abortion should be legal, though I think there should be more limits and regulation placed on abortion, more counseling done beforehand, etc. However, whether or not you believe Dr. Tiller was a murderer for performing abortions (many life-saving, by the way), to act as though his murder is justifiable is nothing short of insane. It is disgusting, and it does nothing but hurt the cause of the "pro-life" movement. Do they not see the irony?
Mr. Leach said he and Mr. Roeder had met once, and Mr. Roeder had described similar views to his own. Of Dr. Tiller's death, Mr. Leach said, "To call this a crime is too simplistic," adding, "There is Christian scripture that would support this."
The man being questioned in connection with the investigation is Scott Roader, 51, of Merriam, Kan. [...] Neighbors said they've seen a similar car at the house in Merriam. They describe the ongoings at the house as strange. They said it's a revolving door of men coming and staying there and describe what appear to be religious gatherings.
As someone who has always called what the Jihadists do terrorism, could I get a response from Malkin as to whether she believes this Christianist murder is terrorism as well? Imagine an Islamist fanatic had assassinated a pro-Israel rabbi in a synagogue, and had harassed synagogues for years, including one arrest for bomb materials in his car. Imagine if one of his associates had tried to kill the rabbi before. Would there be any question that this was Islamist terror? So why is this not Christianist terror?
These questions are obvious to me, but obviously they are not obvious to people like Michelle Malkin and Bill O'Reilly, who are clearly enablers of these heinous killers.
Randall Terry, Founder of Operation Rescue, will hold a press conference to discuss how the pro-life movement should deal with Dr. Tiller's death...
Mr. Terry states: "We must not fear, we must not flinch, we must not retreat a single inch. George Tiller was a mass murderer, and we must continue to say so in his death just as we did in his life.
Terry said he was now concerned that the Obama administration "will use Tiller's killing to intimidate pro-lifers into surrendering our most effective rhetoric and actions.
If he means that this will help the passage of the hate-crimes bill and will work against the murder of human beings in cold blood in front of their churches, let's hope he's 100% correct.
Finally, do not be coaxed into thinking these people are just a few bad apples, or fringe elements. They are well-backed, well-financed, and seen as heroes by many. The responses on Twitter are a testament to that.
# Crap, I always forgot hashtags. I'm happy Tiller's dead. - Jennifer Waite, Selah, Washington
# UPDATE... Doctor George Tiller was aborted today in his 204th trimester - aren't paybacks a bitch - Punch
# oh HAPPY DAY! Tiller the baby killer is DEAD! - Samantha Pelch
# George Tiller the baby killer was shot dead this morning. God bless the gunmen who hopefully won't be caught. - readnwatchchris, Creedmor. NC
# was George Tiller the baby killers brain scrambled the way he scrambled full term fetuses.. one can only hope - Brad S
# Infamous baby killer George Tiller gunned down at (irony) church. Why do I not feel sorry for him? Have fun at Judgment Day. - James Fiddler
# tiller the baby killer shot dead...wow. is it insensitive of me to say what goes around comes around? - Brad M. Negulescu Cleveland.
# George Tiller the Baby Killer shot dead. May he rot in Hell. - Amy Strong
# Tiller Baby Killer was shot and killed this morning Justice has been served. - Shirl Ledeux
# Thinking about "Tiller the baby killer" He now knows the wages of sin is death. - Dianne McDowell
# May Tiller rot in Hell , infanticide is the murder of babies, he WAS a provider of death like Hitler, Bundy the list goes on.... - Dennis, A People Voip Company
# Burn in hell George Tiller - mikedanben Sparta, NJ (41.005501,-74.672)
# No need to pray for George Tiller. We know he went straight to hell!!!!! - Laurie D. Bailey Olive Branch, MS
# Good ridence to Tiller - babies will not be murdered because he is now gone. Wonder how he likes hell! - Jay Emess, Southern, NJ
# Karma is a beautiful thing. Cheers to the hero who sent George Tiller where he belongs... straight to hell. - Matthew Kamar
Thanks, CarlNation, for that summary. Frighteningly, that's all it is - a summary. Check out the Twitter search results for up-to-the-minute hate and bile. I fear for my country when this kind of thing can happen and so many outwardly and hatefully support it. When, inevitably, this insane (accused) murderer ends up on death row, I will protest it, because no murder is fair or right - not even the murder of sub-human cretins like these right wing crazies.
That's how Barack Obama and his presidential campaign team described John McCain last year when the Republican candidate famously said "the fundamentals of our economy are strong."
But now President Obama and his advisers are adopting similar rhetoric as they try to build public confidence in an economic turnaround.
Actually, one of his advisers, not Obama himself, said the "fundamentals are sound," while McCain said the "fundamentals are strong." Play word games all you like, but those are very different. The fundamentals have been *sound* this entire time, but certainly not *strong*. Feel free to compare the two in a dictionary.
Just to be clear. Also, they obviously do think the fundamentals are sounder now than they were then, now that they've implemented some of their own policies to try and fix things. You may disagree with whether those policies will work, but they are justified in thinking, at least in their minds, that they've made some fixes.
"But the clip of Biden seemingly making a recent remark about the strength of the economy is grossly inaccurate. The Biden statement was actually from last September - during the presidential campaign - when he was quoting Sen. John McCain (R-AZ). Here's what Biden really said:
Ladies and gentlemen, I believe that's why John McCain could say with a straight face as recently as this morning and this is a quote, "the fundamentals of the economy are strong." That's what John said. He says that "We've made great progress economically in the Bush years."
Beautiful. Nice try, Fox, but this is even below your normal ridiculousness.
UPDATE: I'm currently in a debate with someone in a forum that will remain unnamed, who doesn't think the distinction is useful... so here:
It IS a huge difference. I'm sorry you don't realize that. Maybe I need to show you the definitions myself:
Sound: solid , firm ; also : stable
Strong: 1: having or marked by great physical power
2: having moral or intellectual power
3: having great resources (as of wealth or talent)
5 a: striking or superior of its kind
Politics : Redefining Recession To Fit Your Agenda
So did you all know that the newest republican talking point I've heard is that the current economic problems were caused purely by the media? Well, it may not be THAT new, but it's gotten louder as the problems have gotten worse (and similarly Obama's ratings have gotten higher). John R. Lott, Jr. said in April:
But over the last half-year, the media and politicians have said we were in a recession even while the economy was still growing.
Gas prices are going up. The economy is slowing. Talk of recession is seemingly everywhere. While the majority of people rate their personal finances positively, consumer confidence in the economy has plunged to a 16-year low, well below what it was during the last year of the Clinton administration when we were in a recession.
My republican friend at work came by my desk yesterday to tell me that Iceland was nearing bankruptcy (which I already knew), but he commented "and it's all because of one U.S. Election."
Confused, I asked him what he meant, and he told me that "the economy was doing great in December," but after Obama was nominated, the media started chanting "recession." According to this theory, this drove fears, causing a lack of confidence in the market, starting a chain reaction.
Now, I'm not saying the media is blameless, but the idea that the economy was "fine" and only started getting bad when the media made up the idea that it was heading south is obviously ludicrous. Then, adding on the idea that they did it because they knew it would help the nominee to the challenging party is just downright despicable. I don't blame him, of course; he didn't make this idea up. He's just been tricked.
The other thing that really gets me is that they're using alot of the same talking points they use to say that Bush inherited "Clinton's recession," which is, of course, a laugh. One of the ways they've done that is to redefine "recession."
Lott again:
Last week, Barack Obama proclaimed "As most experts know, our economy is in a recession." Hillary Clinton made similar staements last fall. Yet, as any economist knows, a recession is two consecutive quarters of negative growth, and we haven't even had one single quarter of negative growth reported. The economy slowed down significantly during the end of last year, but that was after a sizzling annual GDP growth rate of 4.9 percent in the third quarter.
My friend used that same definition to prove that Clinton left at the beginning of a recession. However,
The NBER does not define a recession in terms of two consecutive quarters of decline in real GDP. Rather, a recession is a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months, normally visible in real GDP, real income, employment, industrial production, and wholesale-retail sales. For more information, see the latest announcement on how the NBER's Business Cycle Dating Committee chooses turning points in the Economy and its latest memo, dated 07/17/03.
The craziest thing to me is that this is all so simple to look up. I didn't know if he was right about the definition of recession, but googling for 10 seconds proved to me that he was wrong. And, not only that, but the President is not the driving force for the economy. Sure, his words and actions make changes to the citizens' confidence, and that is important, but he's hardly the commander-in-chief of the U.S. economy. Republicans are grasping at straws here and redefining a very important word so that it has one simple definition that fits their agendas. However, "recession" is a very complicated word with a very detailed definition. Whether we're in one now or were in one when Clinton left office is not a decision I can make, because I'm not an economist, but clearly my Republican friends feel otherwise.
BOSTON - A suspicious package alert that shut down downtown Boston Wednesday afternoon was actually part of an elaborate marketing campaign by the Cartoon Network to spark interest in its "Aqua Teen Hunger Force" show.
Absolutely ridiculous. This has been done in 8 or 9 other cities with no problems at all. All of a sudden, Boston freaks out, and Fox acts like Turner has dome something awful. The terror involved is funny, but more funny "uh oh" then funny "ha ha," because if LED cartoon characters are creating bomb scares, we have a serious problem!
To recap the story: three malls in the Palm Beach area are calling their seasonal varmints by names other than the Easter Bunny, so as to get all parents, not just the Christian ones, to bring the tikes to the mall to get some chocolate eggs and then buy a bunch of stuff from Toys 'R Us
The promo from the Fox News site:
Why is the "Easter bunny" under attack? You won't believe what some malls in Florida have planned less than two weeks before one of biggest day's on the Christian calendar.
Ok, no, seriously. This is true. From the transcript:
SEAN HANNITY, CO-HOST: You know something, David? Look, where is the tolerance on the left anymore? I mean, this is the Easter Bunny. This is about Bob's kids and my kids going to the mall. Are you really going to be hurt, are you really going to be offended by a mall identifying a bunny as the Easter Bunny? Is your faith shaken that deeply?
SILVERMAN: On a scale of one to ten, we're talking about a two. But on a scale of one to ten, the actual act of calling it something more neutral is nice to see. You know, it's nicer to see.
HANNITY: Should we remove the name of Jesus Christ from the public square totally?
SILVERMAN: We're talking about the Easter Bunny.
HANNITY: Take "In God We Trust" off U.S. coins, right? "One nation under God" out of the Pledge. We go back to the Declaration of Independence and say, "Endowed by our creator," out, too?
SILVERMAN: Absolutely not. We're talking about malls that are allowed to call the Easter Bunny anything they want.
This is faaaaaaaaaaar nuttier than the Christmas is under attack bullshit that O'Reilly and his cohorts were spouting at the end of last year. At least that was about people "attacking" a Christian holiday... not that it's really very Christian anymore... and not that anyone was actually attacking it. But the EASTER BUNNY? The only relation he has to Easter is that his name includes the word, and in some homes he shows up on Easter to give the kids candy. He certainly has nothing at all to do with the resurrection of Jesus, that's for sure.
I mean damn, the idea of a Godman dying and being resurrected is very deeply rooted in Paganism, but the Easter Bunny is quadruply so.
The rabbit is well known as a sexual symbol of fertility. In various parts of the world, religions which developed from Babel also associate the rabbit with periodicity, both human and lunar (Egypt, China, etc.). As you may remember, the Mother Goddess Semiramis (Easter) is associated with the Moon. In other words, the Easter bunny symbolizes the Mother Goddess. Annual Spring time fertility rituals are associated worship of the Mother Goddess and Tammuz, the reincarnation of her husband Nimrod.
In fact, many Christians think it's evil to do the whole bunny thing, because it's so Pagan and evil and... whatnot.
Finally, we hear from Rush:
Rush concludes by saying, "But I bet this is happening all over the country: the banning of the Easter bunny and Easter eggs and this sort of thing." And if it is, it's undoubtedly the fault of the ACLU, Ward Churchill, and Hillary Clinton.
COLMES: How did a guy like Jeff Gannon, Jim Guckert, get in there? How did that happen? As I understand it, you wouldn't take his questions for a week, is that right?
FLEISCHER: For one week, that's correct. This is a real tough one, because the problem you have got is who in the government should decides who is a reporter and who isn't? What standards do you use to make those decisions?
In the history of the White House - it's a long history - has been relatively inclusive, more so than the Senate and the House press galleries. And it's led to some colorful characters left and right...
COLMES: But it's not easy to get a day pass. He gets these daily passes. How does this happen? Isn't somebody on the inside giving this guy a pass?
FLEISCHER: Oh, sure. He couldn't have gotten in if he didn't have a pass.
COLMES: Knowing he would ask softball questions of the president, right?
FLEISCHER: Well, you know, he asked conservative questions. I don't know I would say those are softball...
COLMES: Oh, come on. You know some of the questions...
FLEISCHER: Does that mean the liberals in the room asked softball questions to Bill Clinton.... who asked softball questions to Bill Clinton?
COLMES: I don't know. To that extent, did they?
FLEISCHER: I think reporters' jobs are to ask tough questions. And if you get a question that matches what you believe, that doesn't necessarily mean there's something wrong with that.
COLMES: All right. But is there a security problem when someone like that gets in there, no one knows how he gets in, no one takes responsibility, using a phony name?
FLEISCHER: There was never a security issue. He had to go through the same metal detectors as everybody else and be searched just like everybody else. That was never a concern or an issue.
I think the tough part is, in this day of bloggers and computers and Internet, how do you define who is a reporter anymore? And even the White House Correspondents Association (search), which represents White House reporters, refused to take a position or a stand because they recognize, who can make this division and who else should be thrown out of that room?
A brilliant article from the AP, via Fox News and Atrios:
Deeply conservative and anti-American, Fallujah has a population of some 200,000, all of whom are members of Islam's mainstream Sunni Muslim sect. Some subscribe to radical interpretations of Islam, finding behavior by American troops like raiding homes and detaining men in front of wives and children as deeply offensive.
CONDOLEEZZA RICE, NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER: Usama bin Laden do two things. The first is you really have to get the intelligence agencies better organized to deal with the terrorist threat to the United States itself. One of the problems that we have is a kind of split responsibility, of course, between the CIA and foreign intelligence and the FBI and domestic intelligence.
There needs to be better cooperation because we don't want to wake up one day and find out that Usama bin Laden has been successful on our own territory.
I just thought I'd share that. We all know how hard those guys spin, but it's hard to deny that Condi does, indeed, mention Osama in this interview. Common Dreams really ought to update their article, because it only says that between January, 2001 and 9/11, she didn't mention Osama or Al Queda. She did, however, mention him in October 2000.
This transcript that Fox has released is a background briefing. We've all given background briefings to the press, and I think we should all be weary from now on when we give them. I think they should be ashamed of themselves for releasing this. They should say "sometimes fair and balanced" after today.
*applause*
I laughed out loud watching the 9/11 Panel. That has to mean something's wrong with me.
Your government failed you. Those entrusted with protecting you failed you. I failed you. We tried hard, but we failed you...I ask for your understanding, and your forgiveness.
Oh yeah, this guy's got an agenda alright. *rolling eyes*
Can be found here, at Fox News. I know, I know, but this is the only place where I see the whole thing.
Also, I've been whining about Islam being called "a source of law" in the new Constitution, but a commentator over at Secular Blasphemy makes a good point.
The "universally agreed tenets of Islam" is a hell of an improvment compared to "Islam". Not much is universially agreed in any religion, so that sentence will be unlikely to mean much.
I have to remind you that the Norwegian constitution says:
"The Evangelical-Lutheran religion shall remain the official religion of the State. The inhabitants professing it are bound to bring up their children in the same."
Yet Norway is one of the most secular states in the world.
That is true... but I don't know if you could really compare Iraq to Norway.